ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015
Prospective study of acute complication rates and associated risk factors in endoscopic therapy for duodenal adenomas.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.Gut and liver · 2025Review
- Endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas: Is cold snaring the promised land?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
- Outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Endoscopic management of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.Endoscopy international open · 2022Review
- Repeat full-thickness resection device use for recurrent duodenal adenoma: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection of duodenal lesions (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection of duodenal lesions-a retrospective analysis of 20 FTRD cases.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- Endoscopic assessment and management of sporadic duodenal adenomas: The results of single centre multidisciplinary management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic therapy for duodenal adenomas is becoming increasingly important. However, only a few studies have been published on the topic, mainly with retrospective data.
methodsThis prospective study was carried out to determine complication rates and associated risk factors during and after endoscopic therapy for duodenal adenomas. Between May 2011 and October 2012, 50 patients (with 61 duodenal adenomas) were included. Sixty-one duodenal adenomas were resected endoscopically. Complications (e.g., bleeding, pain, fever, pancreatitis, and perforation) were recorded. Associations between bleeding and other factors--sex, age, anticoagulation, location and size of adenomas, etiology, lesion morphology, resection type, and argon plasma coagulation (APC) for bleeding prophylaxis--were then investigated.
resultsBleeding was the main complication. Major bleeding occurred in four cases (6.5%) and minor bleeding in 11 (18%). One occult perforation also occurred. There was a statistically significant association between bleeding and the size of the adenoma (P = 0.012). APC for bleeding prophylaxis showed a promising trend, with an odds ratio of 0.31, reducing the bleeding risk by two-thirds in this study. However, due to the small number of six patients that received bleeding prophylaxis with APC therapy, this result was not statistically significant (P = 0.31).
conclusionsBleeding is the main complication in endoscopic therapy for duodenal adenomas. The bleeding risk increases significantly with adenoma size. Prophylactic APC seems to reduce the bleeding rate--however, because of the relatively small number of patients treated with APC, this partial result was not statistically relevant. Due to the relevant rate of complications, endoscopic resection of duodenal adenomas is only recommended in an in-patient setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.