Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25380652›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2015

Assessing exposures to household air pollution in public health research and program evaluation.

Amanda L Northcross, Nina Hwang, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Sumi Mehta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Indoor PMScientific reports · 2017
    Trial
  4. Strategies for ascertaining timing of address changes in administrative data.International journal of population data science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Indoor Air Pollution and Respiratory Health.Clinics in chest medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda L NorthcrossDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave 7th Floor, 20057, Washington, DC, USA, northcross@gwu.edu.
Nina Hwang
Kalpana Balakrishnan
Sumi Mehta
Milken Institute · USDigital Research Alliance of CanadaSri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to smoke from the use of solid fuels and inefficient stoves for cooking and heating is responsible for approximately 4 million premature deaths yearly. As increasing investments are made to tackle this important public health issue, there is a need for identifying and providing guidance on best practices for exposure and stove performance monitoring, particularly for public health research and evaluation studies. This paper, which builds upon the discussion at an expert consultation on exposure assessment convened by the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and PATH in late 2012, aims to provide general guidance on what to monitor, who and where to monitor, and how to monitor household air pollution exposures. In addition, we summarize information about commercially available monitoring equipment and the technical properties of these monitors most important for household air pollution exposure assessment. The target audience includes epidemiologists conducting health studies and program evaluators aiming to quantify changes in exposures to estimate the potential health benefits of cookstoves intervention projects.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorBiomedical ResearchCarbon MonoxideEnvironmental MonitoringHumansInhalation ExposureParticulate MatterProgram EvaluationPublic HealthCarbon MonoxideParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID25380652
PMCPMC4416115
OpenAlexW2088974202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.