ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2015
Variation in predictive ability of common genetic variants by established strata: the example of breast cancer and age.
Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure accumulation drives age-dependent disease architectures and polygenic risk scores.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Gene-environment interactions within a precision environmental health framework.Cell genomics · 2024Review
- Field cancerization in breast cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2022Review
- Gene-lifestyle interactions in the genomics of human complex traits.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- A polygenic-score-based approach for identification of gene-drug interactions stratifying breast cancer risk.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Abruptio placentae risk and genetic variations in mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation: replication of a candidate gene association study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Article
- Update on the State of the Science for Analytical Methods for Gene-Environment Interactions.American journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
- Evidence for large-scale gene-by-smoking interaction effects on pulmonary function.International journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
- A perspective on interaction effects in genetic association studies.Genetic epidemiology · 2016Article
- Reclassification of genetic-based risk predictions as GWAS data accumulate.Genome medicine · 2016Article
- Influence of age on predictiveness of genetic risk score for prostate cancer in a Chinese hospital-based biopsy cohort.Oncotarget · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies of breast cancer and common genetic markers have failed to identify pervasive gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Theoretical considerations also suggest that the contribution of modest interactions to risk discrimination in the general population is likely small. However, the clinical utility of common breast cancer risk markers may nonetheless differ across strata defined by known risk factors, such as age.
methodsWe examined the age-specific per-allele odds ratios of 15 common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found to be associated with breast cancer in 1142 breast cancer cases and 1145 controls from the Nurses' Health Study. We calculated the age-specific discriminatory ability of risk models incorporating these SNPs. We then conducted simulation studies to explore how hypothetical underlying genetic models may fit the observed results.
resultsAlthough all individual SNP-by-age interactions were modest, we found a negative interaction effect between age and a genetic risk score defined by the sum of risk alleles (P = 0.04). We also observed a decrease in discriminatory ability, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), of the SNPs with age (P = 0.04). Simulation studies revealed models where the AUC can differ by strata defined by a risk factor without the presence of interactions; however, our study suggests that the observed differences in AUC are explained by the age-specific effect of the SNPs.
conclusionThe identification of risk factors that alter the effect of multiple genetic variants can help to explain the genetic architecture of multifactorial diseases and identify subgroups of persons who may benefit from genetic screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.