Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25380083›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2014

Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography as a screening tool for occult malignancy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: an observational study.

Maria Chauchard, Khadija Benali, Thomas Papo, Karim Sacre

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. ANMCO Position Paper: long-term follow-up of patients with pulmonary thromboembolism.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria ChauchardDepartment of Internal Medicine (MC, TP, KS); Department of Nuclear Medicine (KBA), Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris; INSERM U1149 (TP, KS), University Paris Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité; and DHU FIRE (Fibrosis, Inflammation and Remodelling in Renal and Respiratory Diseases) (TP, KS), Paris, France.
Khadija Benali
Thomas Papo
Karim Sacre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first clinical manifestation of an occult malignancy. We aimed to assess the value, in daily practice, of positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) for occult malignancy diagnosis in patients with unprovoked VTE.All PET-CTs performed over 5-years period (from January 2009 to October 2013) in adult patients followed in the Department of Internal Medicine (Bichat Hospital, Paris, France) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical history, imaging findings, and additional diagnostic tests performed because of PET-CT findings were analyzed.From January 2009 to October 2013, PET-CT was performed for malignancy diagnosis in 67 consecutive patients with unprovoked VTE. Seventeen patients were excluded because of congenital or acquired thrombophilia, known cancer, estrogen use, inability to confirm VTE diagnosis, or missing data. Fifty patients (25 women; mean age, 65.2 ± 15.9 years) were included. VTE was a first episode in 84% of cases. In 22 (44%) patients, PET-CT showed increased uptake suspicious for malignancy. After additional procedures, malignancy was confirmed in 12/22 patients. In all cases of confirmed malignancies, conventional computed tomography scan (CT-scan) had similar diagnosis yield, as compared with PET-CT. In 10/22 cases, the suspected diagnosis of malignancy could not be confirmed despite extensive workup including specialist visits (n = 5), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 4), gastrointestinal tract endoscopy (n = 3), endometrial biopsies (n = 2), and hysterectomy (n = 1). The cost of additional diagnosis procedures performed because of false positive PET-CT amounted to є1956/patient. Interestingly, considering CT-scan findings only, no further investigation would have been scheduled. No patient with negative or false positive PET-CT was diagnosed with cancer during a mean follow-up of 22 ± 13.6 months.A diagnosis strategy based on PET-CT screening for malignancy in patients with unprovoked VTE had limited diagnosis value and may lead to unnecessary alarming and money- and time-consuming investigations.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedVenous ThromboembolismAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyDiagnostic ErrorsEarly Detection of CancerEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleFranceHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID25380083
PMCPMC4616277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.