Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25379899›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Automatic background knowledge selection for matching biomedical ontologies.

Daniel Faria, Catia Pesquita, Emanuel Santos, Isabel F Cruz, Francisco M Couto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tackling the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel FariaLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Catia PesquitaLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Emanuel SantosDepartamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Isabel F CruzADVIS Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States of America.
Francisco M CoutoLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ontology matching is a growing field of research that is of critical importance for the semantic web initiative. The use of background knowledge for ontology matching is often a key factor for success, particularly in complex and lexically rich domains such as the life sciences. However, in most ontology matching systems, the background knowledge sources are either predefined by the system or have to be provided by the user. In this paper, we present a novel methodology for automatically selecting background knowledge sources for any given ontologies to match. This methodology measures the usefulness of each background knowledge source by assessing the fraction of classes mapped through it over those mapped directly, which we call the mapping gain. We implemented this methodology in the AgreementMakerLight ontology matching framework, and evaluate it using the benchmark biomedical ontology matching tasks from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2013. In each matching problem, our methodology consistently identified the sources of background knowledge that led to the highest improvements over the baseline alignment (i.e., without background knowledge). Furthermore, our proposed mapping gain parameter is strongly correlated with the F-measure of the produced alignments, thus making it a good estimator for ontology matching techniques based on background knowledge.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesInternetAnimalsAutomationHumansMiceSemantics

Identifiers

PMID25379899
PMCPMC4224389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.