Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25379370›Full record

ArticleOsong public health and research perspectives2014

Knowledge of diabetes mellitus: does gender make a difference?

Patrício Fernando Lemes Dos Santos, Poliana Rodrigues Dos Santos, Graziele Souza Lira Ferrari, Gisele Almeida Amaral Fonseca, Carlos Kusano Bucalen Ferrari

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physical Comorbidity According to Diagnoses and Sex among Psychiatric Inpatients in South Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrício Fernando Lemes Dos SantosInstitute of Biological and Health Sciences, Araguaia, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças, Brazil.
Poliana Rodrigues Dos SantosInstitute of Biological and Health Sciences, Araguaia, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças, Brazil.
Graziele Souza Lira FerrariInstitute of Biological and Health Sciences, Araguaia, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças, Brazil.
Gisele Almeida Amaral FonsecaUnivar, Barra do Garças, Brazil.
Carlos Kusano Bucalen FerrariLatin American Institute of Life and Natural Sciences, Federal University of Latin American Integration, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil ; Graduate Program on Basic and Applied Immunology and Parasitology, Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Araguaia, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRUniversidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease considered an important public health problem. In recent years, its prevalence has been exponentially rising in many developing countries. Chronic complications of DM are important causes of morbidity and mortality among patients, which impair their health and quality of life. Knowledge on disease prevention, etiology, and management is essential to deal with parents, patients, and caregivers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge regarding DM in an adult population from a Middle-western Brazilian city.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study covering 178 adults, aged 18-64 years, who answered a diabetes knowledge questionnaire. In order to identify the difference between groups, analysis of variance was used.

resultsHigher knowledge scores were found regarding the role of sugars on DM causality, diabetic foot care, and the effects of DM on patients (blindness, impaired wound healing, and male sexual dysfunction). However, lower scores were found amongst types of DM, hyperglycemic symptoms, and normal blood glucose levels. Females tended to achieve better knowledge scores than males.

conclusionWomen had better knowledge regarding types of DM, normal blood glucose values, and consequences of hyperglycemia revealed that diabetes education should be improved.

Indexed as

Amazondiabetes mellitushealth educationwomen

Identifiers

PMID25379370
PMCPMC4215000
OpenAlexW2157960480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.