Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25379092›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2014

Characterization of microfluidic shear-dependent epithelial cell adhesion molecule immunocapture and enrichment of pancreatic cancer cells from blood cells with dielectrophoresis.

Chao Huang, James P Smith, Trisha N Saha, Andrew D Rhim, Brian J Kirby

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
James P SmithSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Trisha N SahaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Andrew D RhimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Brian J Kirby
Cornell University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143876 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2009 to 2014
$12.6M
Role of Neurogenic Inflammation in Pancreatic CancerR01CA177857 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DAVIS, BRIAN M · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
Dissecting stromal-epithelial interactions in the adult exocrine pancreasK08DK088945 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RHIM, ANDREW D · 2010 to 2015
$765k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177857NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143876NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK088945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current microfluidic techniques for isolating circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from cancer patient blood are limited by low capture purity, and dielectrophoresis (DEP) has the potential to complement existing immunocapture techniques to improve capture performance. We present a hybrid DEP and immunocapture Hele-Shaw flow cell to characterize DEP's effects on immunocapture of pancreatic cancer cells (Capan-1, PANC-1, and BxPC-3) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with an anti-EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) antibody. By carefully specifying the applied electric field frequency, we demonstrate that pancreatic cancer cells are attracted to immunocapture surfaces by positive DEP whereas PBMCs are repelled by negative DEP. Using an exponential capture model to interpret our capture data, we show that immunocapture performance is dependent on the applied DEP force sign and magnitude, cell surface EpCAM expression level, and shear stress experienced by cells flowing in the capture device. Our work suggests that DEP can not only repel contaminating blood cells but also enhance capture of cancer cell populations that are less likely to be captured by traditional immunocapture methods. This combination of DEP and immunocapture techniques to potentially increase CTC capture purity can facilitate subsequent biological analyses of captured CTCs and research on cancer metastasis and drug therapies.

Identifiers

PMID25379092
PMCPMC4189216
OpenAlexW2025098441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.