Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25379014›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2014

Dynamic and influential interaction of cancer cells with normal epithelial cells in 3D culture.

Laura P Ivers, Brendan Cummings, Funke Owolabi, Katarzyna Welzel, Rut Klinger, Sayaka Saitoh, Darran O'Connor, Yasuyuki Fujita, Dimitri Scholz, Nobue Itasaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura P IversSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
Brendan CummingsSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
Funke OwolabiSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
Katarzyna WelzelConway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
Rut KlingerConway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland ; School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
Sayaka SaitohInstitute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0815 Japan.
Darran O'ConnorConway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland ; School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
Yasuyuki FujitaInstitute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0815 Japan.
Dimitri ScholzConway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
Nobue ItasakiSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4 Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEHokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cancer microenvironment has a strong impact on the growth and dynamics of cancer cells. Conventional 2D culture systems, however, do not reflect in vivo conditions, impeding detailed studies of cancer cell dynamics. This work aims to establish a method to reveal the interaction of cancer and normal epithelial cells using 3D time-lapse.

methodsGFP-labelled breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231, were co-cultured with mCherry-labelled non-cancerous epithelial cells, MDCK, in a gel matrix. In the 3D culture, the epithelial cells establish a spherical morphology (epithelial sphere) thus providing cancer cells with accessibility to the basal surface of epithelia, similar to the in vivo condition. Cell movement was monitored using time-lapse analyses. Ultrastructural, immunocytochemical and protein expression analyses were also performed following the time-lapse study.

resultsIn contrast to the 2D culture system, whereby most MDA-MB-231 cells exhibit spindle-shaped morphology as single cells, in the 3D culture the MDA-MB-231 cells were found to be single cells or else formed aggregates, both of which were motile. The single MDA-MB-231 cells exhibited both round and spindle shapes, with dynamic changes from one shape to the other, visible within a matter of hours. When co-cultured with epithelial cells, the MDA-MB-231 cells displayed a strong attraction to the epithelial spheres, and proceeded to surround and engulf the epithelial cell mass. The surrounded epithelial cells were eventually destroyed, becoming debris, and were taken into the MDA-MB-231 cells. However, when there was a relatively large population of normal epithelial cells, the MDA-MB-231 cells did not engulf the epithelial spheres effectively, despite repeated contacts. MDA-MB-231 cells co-cultured with a large number of normal epithelial cells showed reduced expression of monocarboxylate transporter-1, suggesting a change in the cell metabolism. A decreased level of gelatin-digesting ability as well as reduced production of matrix metaroproteinase-2 was also observed.

conclusionsThis culture method is a powerful technique to investigate cancer cell dynamics and cellular changes in response to the microenvironment. The method can be useful for various aspects such as; different combinations of cancer and non-cancer cell types, addressing the organ-specific affinity of cancer cells to host cells, and monitoring the cellular response to anti-cancer drugs.

Indexed as

3D cultureCancer microenvironmentCell-cell interactionMCF7MDA-MB-231MDCKTime-lapse movie

Identifiers

PMID25379014
PMCPMC4221723
OpenAlexW2096571281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.