Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25378928›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

Biological impact of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging of head and neck cancer cells.

Antje Lindemann, Kerstin Lüdtke-Buzug, Bianca M Fräderich, Ksenija Gräfe, Ralph Pries, Barbara Wollenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Imaging Constructs: The Rise of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Review of Magnetic Particle Imaging and Perspectives on Neuroimaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Magnetic particle imaging in vascular medicine.Innovative surgical sciences · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antje LindemannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Kerstin Lüdtke-BuzugInstitute of Medical Engineering, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Bianca M FräderichDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Ksenija GräfeInstitute of Medical Engineering, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Ralph PriesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Barbara WollenbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a tomographic imaging technology, magnetic particle imaging (MPI) allows high spatial resolution and sensitivity, and the possibility to create real-time images by determining the spatial distribution of magnetic particles. To ensure a prospective biosafe application of UL-D (University of Luebeck-Dextran coated superparamagnetic nanoparticles), we evaluated the biocompatibility of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), their impact on biological properties, and their cellular uptake using head and neck squamous cancer cells (HNSCCs).

methodsSPIONs that met specific MPI requirements were synthesized as tracers. Labeling and uptake efficiency were analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin staining and magnetic particle spectrometry. Flow cytometry, 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays, and real-time cell analyzer assays were used to investigate apoptosis, proliferation, and the cytokine response of SPION-labeled cells. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was determined using a fluorescent dye. Experimental results were compared to the contrast agent Resovist(®), a standard agent used in MPI.

resultsUL-D nanoparticles and Resovist particles were taken up in vitro by HNSCCs via unspecific phagocytosis followed by cytosolic accumulation. To evaluate toxicity, flow cytometry analysis was performed; results showed that dose- and time-dependent administration of Resovist induced apoptosis whereas cell viability of UL-D-labeled cells was not altered. We observed decreased cell proliferation in response to increased SPION concentrations. An intracellular production of ROS could not be detected, suggesting that the particles did not cause oxidative stress. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukins IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β were measured to distinguish inflammatory responses. Only the primary tumor cell line labeled with >0.5 mM Resovist showed a significant increase in IL-1β secretion.

conclusionOur data suggest that UL-D SPIONs are a promising tracer material for use in innovative tumor cell analysis in MPI.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCytokinesDiagnostic ImagingHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMagnetite NanoparticlesReactive Oxygen SpeciesCytokinesMagnetite NanoparticlesReactive Oxygen Speciesbiomedical imagingcell labelingcytotoxicityHNSCCsiron oxide nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID25378928
PMCPMC4218924
OpenAlexW2017119029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.