Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25378384›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014

Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study.

Alejandra Castanon, Rebecca Landy, Peter Brocklehurst, Heather Evans, Donald Peebles, Naveena Singh, Patrick Walker, Julietta Patnick, Peter Sasieni, PaCT Study Group

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. A Comparison of Methods for Modeling Multistate Cancer Progression Using Screening Data with Censoring after Intervention.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of large-loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical morphology: A prospective observational study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandra CastanonCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bart's and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Rebecca LandyCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bart's and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Peter BrocklehurstInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Heather EvansDepartment of Gynaecology, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, UK.
Donald PeeblesInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Naveena SinghDivision of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health, London, UK.
Patrick WalkerDepartment of Gynaecology, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, UK.
Julietta PatnickNHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Public Health England, Sheffield, UK.
Peter SasieniCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bart's and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK p.sasieni@qmul.ac.uk.
PaCT Study Group
Queen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBPublic Health England · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16892Department of Health PB-PG-1208-16187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the association between depth of excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm birth.

designCase-control study nested in record linkage cohort study.

setting12 hospitals in England.

participantsFrom a cohort of 11 471 women with at least one histological sample taken at colposcopy and a live singleton birth (before or after colposcopy), 1313 women with a preterm birth (20-36 weeks) were identified and frequency matched on maternal age at delivery, parity, and study site to 1313 women with term births (38-42 weeks).

main outcome measuresRisk of preterm birth and very/extreme preterm birth by depth of excisional treatment of the cervical transformation zone.

resultsAfter exclusions, 768 preterm births (cases) and 830 term births after colposcopy remained. The risk of preterm birth was no greater in women with a previous small (<10 mm) excision (absolute risk 7.5%, 95% confidence interval 6.0% to 8.9%) than in women with a diagnostic punch biopsy (7.2%, 5.9% to 8.5%). Women with a medium (10-14 mm) (absolute risk 9.6%; relative risk 1.28, 0.98 to 1.68), large (15-19 mm) (15.3%; 2.04, 1.41 to 2.96), or very large (≥ 20 mm) excision (18.0%; 2.40, 1.53 to 3.75) had a higher risk of preterm delivery than those with small excision. The same pattern was seen in 161 women with very/extremely preterm births (20-31 weeks) and with increasing volume excised. Most births were conceived more than three years after colposcopy, and the risk of preterm delivery did not seem to depend on time from excision to conception.

conclusionsThe risk of preterm birth is at most minimally affected by a small excision. Larger excisions, particularly over 15 mm or 2.66 cm(3), are associated with a doubling of the risk of both preterm and very preterm births. The risk does not decrease with increasing time from excision to conception. Efforts should be made to excise the entire lesion while preserving as much healthy cervical tissue as possible. Close obstetric monitoring is warranted for women who have large excisions of the cervical transformation zone.

Indexed as

Premature BirthAdultBiopsyCase-Control StudiesColposcopyEnglandFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, NeoplasticRisk FactorsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25378384
PMCPMC4220819
OpenAlexW2020764941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.