ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2015
[Case numbers and revenues of main and affiliated ophthalmological departments: Developments since 2005].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Care in Specialist Ophthalmology Departments: Structure and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2023Article
- [Glaucoma in inpatient care in Germany in 2015].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, very little data exist on the development of healthcare-related and financial parameters of both types of inpatient treatment: clinical units run by affiliated physicians and those run by hospital physicians.
aimThis study used a methodology based on published secondary data to estimate the annual number of cases and revenues for in inpatient ophthalmological treatment differentiated into clinical units run by affiliated physicians and those run by hospital physicians. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe case-based flat-rate catalogs and accompanying research data published annually by the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (Institut für Entgeltsysteme im Krankenhaus, InEK) served as a data source. The numbers of annual cases according to major diagnostic categories (MDC) and diagnosis-related groups (DRG), stratified by the unit type are reported for the period 2005-2012. The cumulative total revenues were calculated based on the number of ophthalmological cases, the effective DRG cost weighting, the length of stay and the national basic case values.
resultsBetween 2005 and 2012 the units run by affiliated physicians showed a contrasting trend to those run by hospital physicians: the number of cases in units run by hospital physicians increased by 14 %, while those in units run by affiliated physicians decreased by 6 %. Up to 2012 the effective cost weighting for cases in units run by hospital physicians decreased to 0.60 (- 3 %) and increased to 0.43 (+ 5 %) for units run by affiliated physicians. In 2012 the corresponding effective case revenue accounted for 1767 euros and 1271 euros, respectively. Total revenue estimates for all inpatient ophthalmological treatment increased from 549 million euros in 2005 to 630 million euros in 2012, while the share of units run by affiliated physicians amounted to 10.6 % and 9.7 %, respectively.
conclusionAccording to the indicators "number of cases" and "total revenue", the affiliated ophthalmologists lost ground compared with inpatient units run by hospital physicians over the period from 2005-2012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25378132What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.