Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25377730›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2015

Interaction between positive allosteric modulators and trapping blockers of the NMDA receptor channel.

Christine M Emnett, Lawrence N Eisenman, Jayaram Mohan, Amanda A Taylor, James J Doherty, Steven M Paul, Charles F Zorumski, Steven Mennerick

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Positive Allosteric Modulation as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy in Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  16. The Role of GluN2C-Containing NMDA Receptors in Ketamine's Psychotogenic Action and in Schizophrenia Models.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  17. Ketamine: NMDA Receptors and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  18. 24(S)-Hydroxycholesterol as a Modulator of Neuronal Signaling and Survival.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christine M EmnettGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Lawrence N Eisenman
Jayaram Mohan
Amanda A Taylor
James J Doherty
Steven M Paul
Charles F Zorumski
Steven Mennerick
Washington University in St. Louis · USInnovative Research (United States) · USCornell University · USSage Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

Systems and Molecular Neurobiology Training ProgramT32GM008151 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, LAWRENCE H · 1985 to 2019
$6.5M
CONTROL OF SYNAPTIC GLUTAMATE RELEASER01MH078823 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MENNERICK, STEVEN J · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
MODULATION OF HIPPOCAMPAL SYNAPTIC PLASTICITYR01MH077791 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZORUMSKI, CHARLES F · 2007 to 2013
$2.4M
Oxysterols and NMDAR FunctionR01MH101874 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MENNERICK, STEVEN J, ZORUMSKI, CHARLES F · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
ETHANOL, NEUROSTEROIDS & HIPPOCAMPAL PLASTICITYR01AA017413 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZORUMSKI, CHARLES F · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017413NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA017413NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008151NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008151-27NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077791NIMH NIH HHS R01MH077791NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078823NIMH NIH HHS R01MH078823NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101874NIMH NIH HHS R01MH101874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMemantine and ketamine are clinically used, open-channel blockers of NMDA receptors exhibiting remarkable pharmacodynamic similarities despite strikingly different clinical profiles. Although NMDA channel gating constitutes an important difference between memantine and ketamine, it is unclear how positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) might affect the pharmacodynamics of these NMDA blockers. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used two different PAMs: SGE-201, an analogue of an endogenous oxysterol, 24S-hydroxycholesterol, along with pregnenolone sulphate (PS), to test on memantine and ketamine responses in single cells (oocytes and cultured neurons) and networks (hippocampal slices), using standard electrophysiological techniques. KEY

resultsSGE-201 and PS had no effect on steady-state block or voltage dependence of a channel blocker. However, both PAMs increased the actions of memantine and ketamine on phasic excitatory post-synaptic currents, but neither revealed underlying pharmacodynamic differences. SGE-201 accelerated the re-equilibration of blockers during voltage jumps. SGE-201 also unmasked differences among the blockers in neuronal networks - measured either by suppression of activity in multi-electrode arrays or by neuroprotection against a mild excitotoxic insult. Either potentiating NMDA receptors while maintaining the basal activity level or increasing activity/depolarization without potentiating NMDA receptor function is sufficient to expose pharmacodynamic blocker differences in suppressing network function and in neuroprotection. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Positive modulation revealed no pharmacodynamic differences between NMDA receptor blockers at a constant voltage, but did expose differences during spontaneous network activity. Endogenous modulator tone of NMDA receptors in different brain regions may underlie differences in the effects of NMDA receptor blockers on behaviour.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnimalsCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHydroxycholesterolsNorsteroidsPregnenoloneRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateStructure-Activity Relationship(delta5,6-3-oxynorcholenyl)dimethylcarbinolHydroxycholesterolsNorsteroidsPregnenolonepregnenolone sulfateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID25377730
PMCPMC4337705
OpenAlexW2164023540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.