Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25377687›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

New combination bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current evidence and future perspectives.

Dave Singh

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Developing Biomaterial-Based mRNA Delivery System for Lung Disease Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Early COPD diagnosis and treatment: A case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Targeting Aging Pathways in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Evidence-based review of data on the combination inhaler umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Pharmacological treatment for COPD; GOLD 2017 changes direction.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dave SinghUniversity of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9QZ, UK.
Medicines Evaluation Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fixed dose combination (FDC) dual bronchodilators that co-administer a long acting β2 -adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) and a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) are a new class of inhaled treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This review focuses on the clinical evidence for the benefit of LABA/LAMA FDCs compared with monocomponent treatments, and also compared with active comparators that are widely used for the treatment of COPD, namely tiotropium and salmeterol-fluticasone. Novel FDC dual bronchodilators include QVA149 and umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI). Long term clinical trials show that QVA149 and UMEC/VI are superior to monocomponent therapy in terms of trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), although the FEV1 improvement was limited to approximately 80-90% of the added monocomponent values. This suggests that the effect of combining a LABA and a LAMA is not fully additive. LABA/LAMA FDC were associated with the largest mean changes in symptoms and health status that were above the minimal clinically important difference, in contrast to the monocomponents. Furthermore, these LABA/LAMA FDCs demonstrated superiority over the active comparators tiotropium and salmeterol-fluticasone in terms of trough FEV1 and patient-reported outcomes. LABA/LAMA FDCs offer a simplified means of maximizing bronchodilation for COPD patients, with the improvements in lung function being mirrored by benefits in terms of symptoms and exacerbations. The use of LABA/LAMA FDCs in clinical practice is set to grow and further studies are needed to define their optimal place in treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDelayed-Action PreparationsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsDry Powder InhalersHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CombinationsMuscarinic AntagonistsbronchodilatorsCOPDfixed dose combinationsQVA149umeclidiniumvilanterol

Identifiers

PMID25377687
PMCPMC4415707
OpenAlexW1667532038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.