Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25377555›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2014

Repurposing an endogenous degradation system for rapid and targeted depletion of C. elegans proteins.

Stephen T Armenti, Lauren L Lohmer, David R Sherwood, Jeremy Nance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. TAG-IN, a swappable strategy for endogenous gene tagging inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. WormTagDB: A Systematic Survey of Endogenously Tagged Proteins inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Constitutive sodium permeability in aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen T ArmentiHelen L. and Martin S. Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Lauren L LohmerDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
David R SherwoodDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Jeremy NanceHelen L. and Martin S. Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA Department of Cell Biology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA jeremy.nance@med.nyu.edu.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAININGT32GM007308 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PHILIPS, MARK REID · 1985 to 2019
$23.2M
Mechanisms of Contact-Mediated Cell Polarization in the C. elegans Embryo.R01GM078341 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI NANCE, JEREMY · 2007 to 2015
$3.1M
Genetic Analysis of Cell Invasion through Basement MembranesR01GM079320 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWOOD, DAVID R · 2007 to 2015
$2.8M
In vivo mechanisms of epithelial cell polarization and junction formationR01GM098492 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI NANCE, JEREMY · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
Understanding How Invadosomes Breach Basement Membrane In VivoR01GM100083 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWOOD, DAVID R · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
In vivo mechanisms for epithelial cell polarizationF30DK093197 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ARMENTI, STEPHEN THOMAS · 2011 to 2014
$188k
NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK093197NIDDK NIH HHS F30DK093197NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078341NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM078341NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079320NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM079320NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098492NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM098492NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100083NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM100083NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capability to conditionally inactivate gene function is essential for understanding the molecular basis of development. In gene and mRNA targeting approaches, protein products can perdure, complicating genetic analysis. Current methods for selective protein degradation require drug treatment or take hours for protein removal, limiting their utility in studying rapid developmental processes in vivo. Here, we repurpose an endogenous protein degradation system to rapidly remove targeted C. elegans proteins. We show that upon expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase substrate-recognition subunit ZIF-1, proteins tagged with the ZF1 zinc-finger domain can be quickly degraded in all somatic cell types examined with temporal and spatial control. We demonstrate that genes can be engineered to become conditional loss-of-function alleles by introducing sequences encoding the ZF1 tag into endogenous loci. Finally, we use ZF1 tagging to establish the site of cdc-42 gene function during a cell invasion event. ZF1 tagging provides a powerful new tool for the analysis of dynamic developmental events.

Indexed as

ProteolysisAnimalsBlotting, WesternCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCarrier ProteinsDNA PrimersFluorescenceGene Expression RegulationGenetic EngineeringImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKineticsPlasmidsTransgenesUbiquitin-Protein LigasesZinc FingersCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCarrier ProteinsDNA PrimersUbiquitin-Protein LigasesZIF-1 protein, C elegansC. elegansGenetic toolMosaicProtein degradation

Identifiers

PMID25377555
PMCPMC4302935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.