Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25377464›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Costs and benefits of group living with disease: a case study of pneumonia in bighorn lambs (Ovis canadensis).

Kezia R Manlove, E Frances Cassirer, Paul C Cross, Raina K Plowright, Peter J Hudson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Disease Ecology of a Low-VirulenceAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. A metapopulation model of social group dynamics and disease applied to Yellowstone wolves.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. How disease constrains the evolution of social systems.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Null expectations for disease dynamics in shrinking habitat: dilution or amplification?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  18. Unraveling the disease consequences and mechanisms of modular structure in animal social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kezia R ManloveCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA krm17@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-5236
E Frances CassirerIdaho Department of Fish and Game, Lewiston, ID 83501, USA.
Paul C CrossUS Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA.
Raina K PlowrightCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Peter J HudsonDepartment of Biology and Huck Institute for Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group living facilitates pathogen transmission among social hosts, yet temporally stable host social organizations can actually limit transmission of some pathogens. When there are few between-subpopulation contacts for the duration of a disease event, transmission becomes localized to subpopulations. The number of per capita infectious contacts approaches the subpopulation size as pathogen infectiousness increases. Here, we illustrate that this is the case during epidemics of highly infectious pneumonia in bighorn lambs (Ovis canadensis). We classified individually marked bighorn ewes into disjoint seasonal subpopulations, and decomposed the variance in lamb survival to weaning into components associated with individual ewes, subpopulations, populations and years. During epidemics, lamb survival varied substantially more between ewe-subpopulations than across populations or years, suggesting localized pathogen transmission. This pattern of lamb survival was not observed during years when disease was absent. Additionally, group sizes in ewe-subpopulations were independent of population size, but the number of ewe-subpopulations increased with population size. Consequently, although one might reasonably assume that force of infection for this highly communicable disease scales with population size, in fact, host social behaviour modulates transmission such that disease is frequency-dependent within populations, and some groups remain protected during epidemic events.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease OutbreaksFemalePneumoniaPopulation DensitySeasonsSheepSheep, BighornSheep Diseasesbighorn sheepepidemic sizesocial contact networksocial immunitytransmission processvariance decomposition

Identifiers

PMID25377464
PMCPMC4241004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.