Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25377236›Full record

SynthesisCognitive processing2015

A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?

M Ribolsi, G Di Lorenzo, G Lisi, C Niolu, A Siracusano

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cognitive processing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M RibolsiDipartimento di Medicina dei Sistemi, Clinica Psichiatrica, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Via Nomentana 1362, 00137, Rome, Italy, michele.81@live.it.
G Di Lorenzo
G Lisi
C Niolu
A Siracusano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon known as "perceptual pseudoneglect" refers to the leftward bias in visuospatial attention in non-clinical samples, possibly as a consequence of right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial attention. The degree of such a lateralized visuospatial attention bias is often assessed using the line bisection task. Interestingly, various psychiatric disorders may influence the expression of this phenomenon. The aim of this paper was to perform a critical appraisal of the literature on the expression of the perceptual pseudoneglect across all psychiatric disorders accompanied by meta-analytical evaluation of the data. Moreover, we will discuss whether this phenomenon may be considered as a trait marker across different psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AttentionFunctional LateralityHumansMental DisordersPerceptual DisordersSpace Perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.