Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2014
Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of 3 Modes of Genetic Counseling in High-Risk Public Hospital
Testing a Culturally Adapted Telephone Genetic Counseling Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Pooled it
- Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Pooled it
- The spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 alleles in Latin America and the Caribbean: a clinical perspective.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2015Pooled it
- Randomized trial promoting cancer genetic risk assessment when genetic counseling cost removed: 1-year follow-up.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Trial
- The ENGAGE study: a 3-arm randomized hybrid type 1 effectiveness and implementation study of an in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of cancer genetic services in childhood cancer survivors.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Identifying Mediators of Intervention Effects Within a Randomized Controlled Trial to Motivate Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment Among Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023Trial
- Improving Uptake of Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment in a Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation Intervention: Large Effect Size but Room to Grow.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Randomized study of remote telehealth genetic services versus usual care in oncology practices without genetic counselors.Cancer medicine · 2021Trial
- Trial
- A randomized controlled intervention to promote readiness to genetic counseling for breast cancer survivors.Psycho-oncology · 2019Trial
- Preferences for in-person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study.Clinical genetics · 2019Trial
- Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018Trial
- Randomized trial of proactive rapid genetic counseling versus usual care for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2018Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk information for Alzheimer disease via telephone.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018Trial
- Genetic Testing in a Population-Based Sample of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors from the REACH Randomized Trial: Cost Barriers and Moderators of Counseling Mode.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017Trial
- Effective Referral of Low-Income Women at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer to Genetic Counseling: A Randomized Delayed Intervention Control Trial.American journal of public health · 2016Trial
- Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.Familial cancer · 2016Trial
- Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016Trial
- Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Trial
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe growing demand for cancer genetic services underscores the need to consider approaches that enhance access and efficiency of genetic counseling. Telephone delivery of cancer genetic services may improve access to these services for individuals experiencing geographic (rural areas) and structural (travel time, transportation, childcare) barriers to access.
methodsThis cluster-randomized clinical trial used population-based sampling of women at risk for BRCA1/2 mutations to compare telephone and in-person counseling for: 1) equivalency of testing uptake and 2) noninferiority of changes in psychosocial measures. Women 25 to 74 years of age with personal or family histories of breast or ovarian cancer and who were able to travel to one of 14 outreach clinics were invited to participate. Randomization was by family. Assessments were conducted at baseline one week after pretest and post-test counseling and at six months. Of the 988 women randomly assigned, 901 completed a follow-up assessment. Cluster bootstrap methods were used to estimate the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between test uptake proportions, using a 10% equivalency margin. Differences in psychosocial outcomes for determining noninferiority were estimated using linear models together with one-sided 97.5% bootstrap CIs.
resultsUptake of BRCA1/2 testing was lower following telephone (21.8%) than in-person counseling (31.8%, difference = 10.2%, 95% CI = 3.9% to 16.3%; after imputation of missing data: difference = 9.2%, 95% CI = -0.1% to 24.6%). Telephone counseling fulfilled the criteria for noninferiority to in-person counseling for all measures.
conclusionsBRCA1/2 telephone counseling, although leading to lower testing uptake, appears to be safe and as effective as in-person counseling with regard to minimizing adverse psychological reactions, promoting informed decision making, and delivering patient-centered communication for both rural and urban women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.