ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2015
Cancer registries in Japan: National Clinical Database and site-specific cancer registries.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facility-level JSMO specialist availability and reconstructable treatment-process measures in colorectal cancer using C-CAT data.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Facility-Level Availability of Japanese Society of Medical Oncology Specialists and Recorded First-Line Treatment-Process Duration in Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics Registry Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and high-quality data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Metabolic syndrome is linked to most cancers incidence.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Increasing survivors of anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy with breast cancer in trastuzumab era: thirty-one-year trends in a Japanese Community.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Observational
- Influence of surgical volume on the mortality and morbidity of gastrointestinal perforation in children.Surgery today · 2024Article
- Time trend of pancreatic cancer mortality in the Western Pacific Region: age-period-cohort analysis from 1990 to 2019 and forecasting for 2044.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- A Privacy-Preserving Distributed Medical Data Integration Security System for Accuracy Assessment of Cancer Screening: Development Study of Novel Data Integration System.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Hemicolectomy Does Not Provide Survival Benefit for Right-Sided Mucinous Colon Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Development and validation of grade-based prediction models for postoperative morbidity in gastric cancer resection using a Japanese web-based nationwide registry.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Article
- Surgical quality improvement programs in Japan and USA: Report from the collaborative projects between Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Review
- Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: Report of National Clinical database 2011-2016.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2018Article
- Editorial.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2018Article
- Systematic Review of Hospital Based Cancer Registries (HBCRs): Necessary Tool to Improve Quality of Care in Cancer PatientsAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Association between the participation of board-certified surgeons in gastroenterological surgery and operative mortality after eight gastroenterological procedures.Surgery today · 2017Article
- Body mass index and survival after diagnosis of invasive breast cancer: a study based on the Japanese National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry.Cancer medicine · 2016Article
- National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency.Surgery today · 2016Article
- Comparison of National Operative Mortality in Gastroenterological Surgery Using Web-based Prospective Data Entry Systems.Medicine · 2015Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cancer registry is an essential part of any rational program of evidence-based cancer control. The cancer control program is required to strategize in a systematic and impartial manner and efficiently utilize limited resources. In Japan, the National Clinical Database (NCD) was launched in 2010. It is a nationwide prospective registry linked to various types of board certification systems regarding surgery. The NCD is a nationally validated database using web-based data collection software; it is risk adjusted and outcome based to improve the quality of surgical care. The NCD generalizes site-specific cancer registries by taking advantage of their excellent organizing ability. Some site-specific cancer registries, including pancreatic, breast, and liver cancer registries have already been combined with the NCD. Cooperation between the NCD and site-specific cancer registries can establish a valuable platform to develop a cancer care plan in Japan. Furthermore, the prognosis information of cancer patients arranged using population-based and hospital-based cancer registries can help in efficient data accumulation on the NCD. International collaboration between Japan and the USA has recently started and is expected to provide global benchmarking and to allow a valuable comparison of cancer treatment practices between countries using nationwide cancer registries in the future. Clinical research and evidence-based policy recommendation based on accurate data from the nationwide database may positively impact the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25376769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.