Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376735›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

VITamin D supplementation in renAL transplant recipients (VITALE): a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial of vitamin D estimating the benefit and safety of vitamin D3 treatment at a dose of 100,000 UI compared with a dose of 12,000 UI in renal transplant recipients: study protocol for a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Marie Courbebaisse, Corinne Alberti, Sandra Colas, Dominique Prié, Jean-Claude Souberbielle, Jean-Marc Treluyer, Eric Thervet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01431430 (Prospective Double Blind Multicentre Randomized Trial of Vitamine D Estimating the Profit of a Treatment by Vitamin D3 at the Dose of 100000 UI by Comparison With a Treatment in the Dose of 12 000 UI at Renal Transplanted Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01431430 phase4completednot on this map

Prospective Double Blind Multicentre Randomized Trial of Vitamine D Estimating the Profit of a Treatment by Vitamin D3 at the Dose of 100000 UI by Comparison With a Treatment in the Dose of 12 000 UI at Renal Transplanted Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2012 to 2016Enrolled538ConditionsRenal Transplant Candidate for Right KidneyArmsCholecalciferol 100 000 UI, Cholecalciferol 12 000 UI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Vitamin D: A Bridge between Kidney and Heart.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: an update on the current status worldwide.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2020
    Review
  10. Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Current evidence on vitamin D deficiency and kidney transplant: What's new?Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marie CourbebaisseDepartment of Physiology, Assistance Publique-hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, F-75015 Paris, France. marie.courbebaisse@egp.aphp.fr.
Corinne Alberti
Sandra Colas
Dominique Prié
Jean-Claude Souberbielle
Jean-Marc Treluyer
Eric Thervet
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRHôpital Européen · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn addition to their effects on bone health, high doses of cholecalciferol may have beneficial non-classic effects including the reduction of incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. These pleiotropic effects have been documented in observational and experimental studies or in small intervention trials. Vitamin D insufficiency is a frequent finding in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), and this population is at risk of the previously cited complications. METHODS/

designThe VITALE study is a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with two parallel groups that will include a total of 640 RTRs. RTRs with vitamin D insufficiency, defined as circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of less than 30 ng/ml (or 75 nmol/l), will be randomized between 12 and 48 months after transplantation to blinded groups to receive vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) either at high or low dose (respectively, 100,000 UI or 12,000 UI every 2 weeks for 2 months then monthly for 22 months) with a follow-up of 2 years. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the benefit/risk ratio of high-dose versus low-dose cholecalciferol on a composite endpoint consisting of de novo diabetes mellitus; major cardiovascular events; de novo cancer; and patient death. Secondary endpoints will include blood pressure (BP) control; echocardiography findings; the incidences of infection and acute rejection episodes; renal allograft function using estimated glomerular filtration rate; proteinuria; graft survival; bone mineral density; the incidence of fractures; and biological relevant parameters of mineral metabolism. DISCUSSION: We previously reported that the intensive cholecalciferol treatment (100 000 IU every 2 weeks for 2 months) was safe in RTR. Using a pharmacokinetic approach, we showed that cholecalciferol 100,000 IU monthly should maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at above 30 ng/ml but below 80 ng/ml after renal transplantation. Taken together, these results are reassuring regarding the safety of the cholecalciferol doses that will be used in the VITALE study. Analysis of data collected during the VITALE study will demonstrate whether high or low-dose cholecalciferol is beneficial in RTRs with vitamin D insufficiency.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01431430.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsKidney TransplantationResearch DesignBiomarkersCholecalciferolClinical ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleHumansParisPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVitamin DVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DBiomarkersCholecalciferolVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25376735
PMCPMC4233037
OpenAlexW2120083709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.