Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376700›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2014

MicroRNA-21 and the clinical outcomes of various carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wenjia Wang, Jinhui Li, Wei Zhu, Chen Gao, RuiJingfang Jiang, Wenxue Li, Qiansheng Hu, Bo Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Exploring research progress in studying serum exosomal miRNA-21 as a molecular diagnostic marker for breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Regulatory Mechanism of MicroRNA Expression in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenjia Wang
Jinhui Li
Wei Zhu
Chen Gao
RuiJingfang Jiang
Wenxue Li
Qiansheng HuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan II Road, Guangzhou 510080, PR China. huqsh@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Bo Zhang
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNKarolinska Institutet · SEState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroRNA-21 (miR-21) has been suggested to play a significant role in the prognosis of carcinoma. The recognition of novel biomarkers for the prediction of cancer outcomes is urgently required. However, the potential prognostic value of miR-21 in various types of human malignancy remains controversial. The present meta-analysis summarises and analyses the associations between miR-21 status and overall survival (OS) in a variety of tumours.

methodsEligible published studies were identified by searching the PubMed and Chinese Biomedicine databases. The patients' clinical characteristics and survival results were pooled, and a pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was used to calculate the strength of this association. A random-effects model was adopted, and then, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed. In addition, an analysis of publication bias was also conducted.

resultsTwenty-seven eligible articles (including 31 studies) were identified that included survival data for 3273 patients. The pooled HR suggested that high miR-21 was clearly related to worse overall survival (HR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.81-2.86), with a heterogeneity measure index of I2 = 76.0%, p = 0.001, showing that miR-21 might be a considerable prognostic factor for poor survival in cancer patients.

conclusionsMiR-21 might be a potentially useful biomarker for predicting cancer prognosis in future clinical applications.

Indexed as

CarcinomaHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisPublication BiasMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID25376700
PMCPMC4232634
OpenAlexW2001171687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.