Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376618›Full record

Trial reportEndocrine-related cancer2015

Phase II clinical trial of pasireotide long-acting repeatable in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

M Cives, P L Kunz, B Morse, D Coppola, M J Schell, T Campos, P T Nguyen, P Nandoskar, V Khandelwal, J R Strosberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Endocrine-related cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Approach to the Patient: Insulinoma.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Somatostatin and Somatostatin Receptors in Tumour Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M CivesDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
P L KunzDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
B MorseDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
D CoppolaDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
M J SchellDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
T CamposDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
P T NguyenDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
P NandoskarDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
V KhandelwalDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
J R StrosbergDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USADepartment of MedicineStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA jonathan.strosberg@moffitt.org.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Integrative Molecular Epidemiology WorkshopR25CA174664 · NCI · AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI Shelley S Tworoger · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pasireotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) is a novel somatostatin analog (SSA) with avid binding affinity to somatostatin receptor subtypes 1, 2, 3 (SSTR1,2,3) and 5 (SSTR5). Results from preclinical studies indicate that pasireotide can inhibit neuroendocrine tumor (NET) growth more robustly than octreotide in vitro. This open-label, phase II study assessed the clinical activity of pasireotide in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic grade 1 or 2 NETs. Patients with metastatic pancreatic and extra-pancreatic NETs were treated with pasireotide LAR (60 mg every 4 weeks). Previous systemic therapy, including octreotide and lanreotide, was not permitted. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 months using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall radiographic response rate (ORR), and safety. Twenty-nine patients were treated with pasireotide LAR (60 mg every 4 weeks) and 28 were evaluable for response. The median PFS was 11 months. The most favorable effect was observed in patients with low hepatic tumor burden, normal baseline chromogranin A, and high tumoral SSTR5 expression. Median OS has not been reached; the 30-month OS rate was 70%. The best radiographic response was partial response in one patient (4%), stable disease in 17 patients (60%), and progressive disease in ten patients (36%). Although grade 3/4 toxicities were rare, pasireotide LAR treatment was associated with a 79% rate of hyperglycemia including 14% grade 3 hyperglycemia. Although pasireotide appears to be an effective antiproliferative agent in the treatment of advanced NETs, the high incidence of hyperglycemia raises concerns regarding its suitability as a first-line systemic agent in unselected patients. SSTR5 expression is a potentially predictive biomarker for response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatinDelayed-Action PreparationspasireotideReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatincarcinoidneuroendocrine tumorspasireotidesomatostatin analogssomatostatin receptors

Identifiers

PMID25376618
PMCPMC4643672
OpenAlexW2322817866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.