SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2015
[Opioids in chronic neuropathic pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration].
Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Method report of the second update of the guidelines on long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Guideline
- Cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Morphine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Oxycodone for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- [Methodology of the development of the updated LONTS guidelines for long-term administration of opioids in noncancer pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Pooled it
- [Opioids in chronic low back pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Pooled it
- [Long-term opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in open-label extension trials with study duration of at least 26 weeks].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Pooled it
- French National Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Opioids: Analgesia, Opioid Use Disorder, and Overdose Prevention-Part 1: Methodology and Pain Management.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Outpatient Oral Neuropathic Pain Management with Photobiomodulation Therapy: A Prospective Analgesic Pharmacotherapy-Paralleled Feasibility Trial.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Role of Photobiomodulation Therapy in Neurological Primary Burning Mouth Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomised Controlled Clinical Trials.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- No Zero Sum in Opioids for Chronic Pain: Neurostimulation and the Goal of Opioid Sparing, Not Opioid Eradication.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- [Effect of ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation on polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication-an observational study].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2020Observational
- Guideline "diagnosis and non interventional therapy of neuropathic pain" of the German Society of Neurology (deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie).Neurological research and practice · 2020Article
- Update on the Management of Diabetic Neuropathy.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2018Article
- [Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and neuropathic pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Review
- The opioid epidemic and national guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain: a perspective from different continents.Pain reports · 2017Article
- Diabetic Neuropathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.Diabetes care · 2017Review
- [Opioids for noncancer pain in the elderly].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Article
- [Recommendations of the updated LONTS guidelines. Long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Review
- Long-term opioid use in non-cancer pain.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy and safety of opioid therapy in chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) is under debate. We updated a recent Cochrane systematic review on the efficacy, tolerability and safety of opioids in CNP.
methodsWe screened MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up until October 2013, as well as the reference sections of original studies and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of opioids in CNP. We included double-blind randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration. Using a random effects model, absolute risk differences (RD) were calculated for categorical data and standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous variables.
resultsWe included 12 RCTs with 1192 participants. The included diagnostic entities were painful diabetic neuropathy (four studies), postherpetic neuralgia (three studies), mixed polyneuropathic pain (two studies), and lumbar root, spinal cord injury and postamputation pain (one study each). Mean study duration was 6 (4-12) weeks. Four studies tested morphine, three studies tramadol, two studies oxycodone and one study tapentadol. These are the pooled results of studies with a parallel or cross-over design: opioids were superior to placebo in reducing pain intensity (SMD - 0.64 [95 % confidence interval, CI - 0.81, - 0.46], p < 0.0001; 11 studies with 1040 participants). Opioids were not superior to placebo in 50 % pain reduction (RD 0.16 [95 % CI - 0.04, 0.35], p = 0.11; one study with 93 participants). Opioids were not superior to placebo in reports of much or very much improved pain (RD 0.17 [95 % CI - 0.01, 0.36], p = 0.07; one study with 53 participants). Opioids were superior to placebo in improving physical functioning (SMD - 0.28 [95 % CI - 0.43, - 0.13], p < 0.0001; seven studies with 680 participants). Patients dropped out less frequently due to lack of efficacy with opioids than with placebo (RD - 0.07 [95 % CI - 0.13, - 0.02], p = 0.008; six studies with 656 participants). Patients dropped out due to adverse events more frequently with opioids than with placebo (RD 0.08 [95 % CI 0.05, 0.12], p < 0.0001; ten studies with 1018 participants; number needed to harm 11 [95 % CI 8-17]). There was no significant difference between opioids and placebo in terms of the frequency of serious adverse events (SAE) or deaths.
conclusionIn short-term studies (4-12 weeks) in CNP, opioids were superior to placebo in terms of efficacy and inferior in terms of tolerability. Opioids and placebo did not differ in terms of safety. The conclusion relating to the safety of opioids compared to placebo in CNP is limited by the low number of SAE and deaths. Short-term opioid therapy may be considered in selected CNP patients. The English full-text version of this article is freely available at SpringerLink (under "Supplementary Material").
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.