Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376547›Full record

SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2015

[Opioids in chronic osteoarthritis pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration].

R Schaefert, P Welsch, P Klose, C Sommer, F Petzke, W Häuser

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mirtazapine for fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Cannabinoids for fibromyalgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

R SchaefertKlinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
P Welsch
P Klose
C Sommer
F Petzke
W Häuser
Heidelberg University · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEKlinikum Saarbrücken · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy, tolerability and safety of opioid therapy in chronic osteoarthritis (OA) pain is under debate. We updated a Cochrane systematic review on the efficacy and safety of opioids in chronic OA pain published in 2009.

methodsWe screened MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up until October 2013, as well as reference sections of original studies and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of opioids in chronic osteoarthritis (OA) pain. We included double-blind randomized placebo-controlled studies lasting ≥ 4 weeks. Using a random effects model, absolute risk differences (RD) were calculated for categorical data and standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous variables.

resultsWe included 20 RCTs with 33 treatment arms and 8545 participants. Median study duration was 12 (4-24) weeks. Oxycodone and tramadol were each tested in six studies; buprenorphine, hydromorphone, morphine and tapentadol each in two studies and codeine, fentanyl and oxymorphone in one study each. Results are reported with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Opioids were superior to placebo in reducing pain intensity (SMD - 0.22 [- 0.28, - 0.17], p < 0.00001; 16 studies with 6743 participants). Opioids were not superior to placebo in 50 % pain reduction (RD - 0.00 [- 0.07, 0.07], p = 0.96; two studies with 2684 participants). Opioids were superior to placebo in terms of reports of much or very much global improvement (RD 0.13 [0.05, 0.21], p = 0.002; three studies with 2251 participants). Opioids were superior to placebo in improving physical functioning (SMD - 0.22 [- 0.28, - 0.17], p < 0.00001; 14 studies with 5887 participants). Patients dropped out more frequently with opioids than with placebo (RD 0.17 [0.14, 0.21], p < 0.00001; 15 studies with 6834 participants; number needed to harm 5 [4-6]. There was no significant difference between opioids and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (SAE) or deaths over the respective observation periods.

conclusionOpioids were superior to placebo in terms of efficacy and inferior in terms of tolerability. The effect sizes of average reduction in pain intensity and physical disability were small. Opioids and placebo did not differ in terms of safety. The conclusion on the safety of opioids compared to placebo is limited by the low number of SAE and deaths. Short-term opioid therapy may be considered in selected chronic OA pain patients. No current evidence-based guideline recommends opioids as first-line treatment option for chronic OA pain. To provide superior evidence for future treatment guidelines, RCTs must directly compare existing pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies and administer these in various combinations and sequences. The English full-text version of this article is freely available at SpringerLink (under "Supplemental").

Indexed as

Long-Term CareAdultAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainDouble-Blind MethodEvidence-Based MedicineHumansOsteoarthritisPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID25376547
OpenAlexW2208223576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.