Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376484›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

Repeat polymorphisms in ESR2 and AR and colorectal cancer risk and prognosis: results from a German population-based case-control study.

Anja Rudolph, Hong Shi, Asta Försti, Michael Hoffmeister, Juan Sainz, Lina Jansen, Kari Hemminki, Hermann Brenner, Jenny Chang-Claude

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Estrogen Receptor-β Gene Cytosine-Adenine (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Sexual Dimorphism in Colon Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exportin-5 Functions as an Oncogene and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Colorectal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anja RudolphDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. a.rudolph@dkfz.de.
Hong Shi
Asta Försti
Michael Hoffmeister
Juan Sainz
Lina Jansen
Kari Hemminki
Hermann Brenner
Jenny Chang-Claude
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEAir Force Medical University · CNDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence has accumulated which suggests that sex steroids influence colorectal cancer development and progression. We therefore assessed the association of repeat polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor β gene (ESR2) and the androgen receptor gene (AR) with colorectal cancer risk and prognosis.

methodsThe ESR2 CA and AR CAG repeat polymorphisms were genotyped in 1798 cases (746 female, 1052 male) and 1810 controls (732 female, 1078 male), matched for sex, age and county of residence. Colorectal cancer risk associations overall and specific for gender were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for sex, county of residence and age. Associations with overall and disease-specific survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for established prognostic factors (diagnosis of other cancer after colorectal cancer diagnosis, detection by screening, treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy, tumour extent, nodal status, distant metastasis, body mass index, age at diagnosis and year of diagnosis) and stratified for grade of differentiation. Heterogeneity in gender specific associations was assessed by comparing models with and without a multiplicative interaction term by means of a likelihood ratio test.

resultsThe average number of ESR2 CA repeats was associated with a small 5% increase in colorectal cancer risk (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10) without significant heterogeneity according to gender or tumoural ESR2 expression. We found no indication for an association between the AR CAG repeat polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer. The ESR2 CA and AR CAG repeat polymorphisms were not associated with overall survival or disease specific survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis.

conclusionsHigher numbers of ESR2 CA repeats are potentially associated with a small increase in colorectal cancer risk. Our study does not support an association between colorectal cancer prognosis and the investigated repeat polymorphisms.

Indexed as

DNA Repeat ExpansionGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenotypeGermanyHumansMalePopulation SurveillancePrognosisReceptors, AndrogenRisk FactorsEstrogen Receptor betaReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID25376484
PMCPMC4232639
OpenAlexW1989513214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.