Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376429›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2015

Sex differences in cognitive regulation of psychosocial achievement stress: brain and behavior.

Lydia Kogler, Ruben C Gur, Birgit Derntl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Lifestyle medicine pillars for women's heart health.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Combinatorial targeting of NMDARs and 5-HTAlzheimer's research & therapy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chronic Stress May Amplify Gender/Sex Differences in Amygdala Reactivity to Ambiguous Emotional Stimuli.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  13. Sex Differences in the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lydia KoglerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Translational Brain Medicine, Jülich-Aachen-Research Alliance, Jülich/Aachen, Germany.
Ruben C Gur
Birgit Derntl
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEJülich Aachen Research Alliance · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cognitive regulation of emotion has been extensively examined, there is a lack of studies assessing cognitive regulation in stressful achievement situations. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging in 23 females and 20 males to investigate cognitive downregulation of negative, stressful sensations during a frequently used psychosocial stress task. Additionally, subjective responses, cognitive regulation strategies, salivary cortisol, and skin conductance response were assessed. Subjective response supported the experimental manipulation by showing higher anger and negative affect ratings after stress regulation than after the mere exposure to stress. On a neural level, right middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and right superior temporal gyrus (STG) were more strongly activated during regulation than nonregulation, whereas the hippocampus was less activated during regulation. Sex differences were evident: after regulation females expressed higher subjective stress ratings than males, and these ratings were associated with right hippocampal activation. In the nonregulation block, females showed greater activation of the left amygdala and the right STG during stress than males while males recruited the putamen more robustly in this condition. Thus, cognitive regulation of stressful achievement situations seems to induce additional stress, to recruit regions implicated in attention integration and working memory and to deactivate memory retrieval. Stress itself is associated with greater activation of limbic as well as attention areas in females than males. Additionally, activation of the memory system during cognitive regulation of stress is associated with greater perceived stress in females. Sex differences in cognitive regulation strategies merit further investigation that can guide sex sensitive interventions for stress-associated disorders.

Indexed as

AchievementAdultAmygdalaAngerBrain MappingEmotionsExecutive FunctionFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHippocampusHumansHydrocortisoneMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePutamenSex FactorsHydrocortisoneamygdalacortisolemotion regulationfMRIgenderhippocampusputamenskin conductance response

Identifiers

PMID25376429
PMCPMC6869735
OpenAlexW1854282018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.