Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376274›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2014

Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction.

Marcel-Philipp Henrichs, Juliane Krebs, Georg Gosheger, Arne Streitbuerger, Markus Nottrott, Tim Sauer, Steffen Hoell, Gurpal Singh, Jendrik Hardes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intramedullary brachytherapy for the treatment of long bone metastatic disease: A case report.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcel-Philipp Henrichs
Juliane Krebs
Georg Gosheger
Arne Streitbuerger
Markus Nottrott
Tim Sauer
Steffen Hoell
Gurpal Singh
Jendrik HardesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149 Muenster, Germany. jendrik.hardes@ukmuenster.de.
University Hospital Münster · DENational University Health System · SGParacelsus-Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical treatment of bone metastases has become increasingly important as patients live longer with metastatic cancer and one of the main aims is a long-lasting reconstruction which survives the patient. Conventional osteosynthesis may not be able to achieve this objective in the context of modern day cancer care.

methodsThis study evaluates the oncological outcomes, treatment-related complications, and function after resection of metastases and reconstruction with modular tumor endoprostheses in 80 patients. All patients who underwent surgical treatment with modular tumor prostheses for bone metastases from 1993 to 2008 were traced by our tumor database and clinical information was recorded from patient case.

resultsMean age was 63 years. The most common primary tumors were renal cell (47%), breast (21%), and lung (8%). The proximal femur was affected in 45%, proximal humerus in 26%, and the distal femur in 17% of cases. In 22 cases, the tumor prosthesis was implanted during a revision operation. Mean overall survival after surgery was 2.9 years. Overall survival rate was 70% at one year and 20% at five years. Implant survival was 83% after one year and 74% at five years. Overall rate of operative revision was 18%.

conclusionsOur data collectively suggest that despite higher costs, implantation of modular tumor endoprostheses may be a suitable treatment for bone metastases with a low complication rate and rapid improvement in function in appropriately selected patients.

Indexed as

Limb SalvagePalliative CarePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis ImplantationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25376274
PMCPMC4289050
OpenAlexW2121053298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.