Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25376213›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2014

Usual energy and macronutrient intakes in 2-9-year-old European children.

C Börnhorst, I Huybrechts, A Hebestreit, V Krogh, A De Decker, G Barba, L A Moreno, L Lissner, M Tornaritis, H-M Loit and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

C BörnhorstLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
I Huybrechts1] Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium [2] Dietary Exposure Assessment Groups, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
A HebestreitLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
V KroghEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
A De DeckerDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
G BarbaEpidemiology and Population Genetics, Institute of Food Science, CNR, Avellino, Italy.
L A Moreno1] GENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) Research Group. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain [2] Faculty of Medicine, University of Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
L LissnerDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
M TornaritisResearch and Education Institute of Child Health, Strovolos, Cyprus.
H-M LoitCenter of Health and Behavioral Science, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.
D MolnárDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical Faculty, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
I Pigeot1] Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany [2] Faculty of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
IDEFICS and the I.Family consortia

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveValid estimates of population intakes are essential for monitoring trends as well as for nutritional interventions, but such data are rare in young children. In particular, the problem of misreporting in dietary data is usually not accounted for. Therefore, this study aims to provide accurate estimates of intake distributions in European children.

designCross-sectional setting-based multi-centre study. SUBJECTS: A total of 9560 children aged 2-9 years from eight European countries with at least one 24-h dietary recall (24-HDR).

methodsThe 24-HDRs were classified in three reporting groups based on age- and sex-specific Goldberg cutoffs (underreports, plausible reports, overreports). Only plausible reports were considered in the final analysis (N=8611 children). The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Method was applied to estimate population distributions of usual intakes correcting for the variance inflation in short-term dietary data.

resultsThe prevalence of underreporting (9.5%) was higher compared with overreporting (3.4%). Exclusion of misreports resulted in a shift of the energy and absolute macronutrient intake distributions to the right, and further led to the exclusion of extreme values, that is, mean values and lower percentiles increased, whereas upper percentiles decreased. The distributions of relative macronutrient intakes (% energy intake from fat/carbohydrates/proteins) remained almost unchanged when excluding misreports. Application of the NCI-Method resulted in markedly narrower intake distributions compared with estimates based on single 24-HDRs. Mean percentages of usual energy intake from fat, carbohydrates and proteins were 32.2, 52.1 and 15.7%, respectively, suggesting the majority of European children are complying with common macronutrient intake recommendations. In contrast, total water intake (mean: 1216.7 ml per day) lay below the recommended value for >90% of the children.

conclusionThis study provides recent estimates of intake distributions of European children correcting for misreporting as well as for the daily variation in dietary data. These data may help to assess the adequacy of young children's diets in Europe.

Indexed as

Child Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietEnergy IntakeChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiet RecordsDiet SurveysEuropeFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMental RecallMicronutrientsMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID25376213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.