Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25375991›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2014

Antibody modeling using the prediction of immunoglobulin structure (PIGS) web server [corrected].

Paolo Marcatili, Pier Paolo Olimpieri, Anna Chailyan, Anna Tramontano

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Computational Modeling of Antibody and T-Cell Receptor (CDR3 Loops).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. VInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paolo MarcatiliPhysics Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, Rome, Italy.
Pier Paolo OlimpieriPhysics Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, Rome, Italy.
Anna ChailyanPhysics Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, Rome, Italy.
Anna Tramontano1] Physics Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, Rome, Italy. [2] Istituto Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies (or immunoglobulins) are crucial for defending organisms from pathogens, but they are also key players in many medical, diagnostic and biotechnological applications. The ability to predict their structure and the specific residues involved in antigen recognition has several useful applications in all of these areas. Over the years, we have developed or collaborated in developing a strategy that enables researchers to predict the 3D structure of antibodies with a very satisfactory accuracy. The strategy is completely automated and extremely fast, requiring only a few minutes (∼10 min on average) to build a structural model of an antibody. It is based on the concept of canonical structures of antibody loops and on our understanding of the way light and heavy chains pack together.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularSoftwareAntibodiesBinding SitesImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulinsInternetProtein ConformationAntibodiesImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulins

Identifiers

PMID25375991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.