Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25375395›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2014

Physician-patient communication on cost and affordability in asthma care. Who wants to talk about it and who is actually doing it.

Minal R Patel, John R C Wheeler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Cost Conversation on Decision-Making Outcomes.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021
    Article
  10. Perspectives on decisions for treatment and care in severe asthma.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Filling the patient-provider knowledge gap: a patient advocate to address asthma care and self-management barriers.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Genesurance Counseling: Patient Perspectives.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minal R Patel1 Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, and.
John R C Wheeler

Funding

Women of Color and Asthma Control R18HL094272 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROWN, RANDALL WESSLEY · 2009 to 2013
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R18HL094272 01NHLBI NIH HHS R18 HL094272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePatient perceptions of financial burden and rates of cost-related nonadherence are high among individuals with asthma across the socioeconomic spectrum. Little is known about preferences and frequency of physician-patient discussions about cost/affordability among individuals managing respiratory conditions.

objectivesTo examine who has a preference to discuss the cost of their asthma care with their physician, how often physician-patient communication about cost/affordability actually is occurring, and what clinical and demographic characteristics of patients are predictive of communication.

methodsData came from 422 African American adult women with asthma who were asked about communication preferences and practices around cost and affordability with their physician. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple variable logistic regression models. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsFifty-two percent (n = 219) of this sample perceived financial burden. Seventy-two percent (n = 300) reported a preference to discuss cost with their health-care provider. Thirty-nine percent (n = 163) reported actually having a conversation with their physician about cost. Among the 61% who reported no discussion, 40% (n = 103) reported financial burden, and 55% (n = 140) reported a preference for discussion. Lower household income (P < 0.001), perception of financial burden (P < 0.001), and higher out-of-pocket expenses for medicines (P < 0.05) were significantly predictive of greater preference to communicate about cost/affordability with the doctor when adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Perception of financial burden (P < 0.001), preference to discuss affordability (P < 0.001), and greater number of chronic conditions (P < 0.001) were significantly predictive of greater likelihood of communication about cost/affordability with the doctor when adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Bivariate analyses revealed that patients who reported a discussion of cost were more likely to report worse asthma control and lower asthma-related quality of life.

conclusionsAn imbalance is evident between patients who would like to discuss cost with their doctor and those who actually do. Patients are interested in low-cost options and a venue for addressing their concerns with a care provider; therefore, a greater understanding is needed in how to effectively and efficiently integrate these conversations and viable solutions into the delivery of health care. Additional research is necessary to determine whether communication about the cost of therapy is associated with health outcomes.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCommunicationCost of IllnessPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAsthmaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMichiganMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceYoung Adultcost-related nonadherencefinancial burdenpatient preferencesself-management

Identifiers

PMID25375395
PMCPMC4298981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.