Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25375357›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Multiple functional risk variants in a SMAD7 enhancer implicate a colorectal cancer risk haplotype.

Barbara K Fortini, Stephanie Tring, Sarah J Plummer, Christopher K Edlund, Victor Moreno, Robert S Bresalier, Elizabeth L Barry, Timothy R Church, Jane C Figueiredo, Graham Casey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara K FortiniDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Stephanie TringDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Sarah J PlummerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Christopher K EdlundDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Victor MorenoCancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERESP and University of Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert S BresalierDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Elizabeth L BarryDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Timothy R ChurchDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Jane C FigueiredoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Graham CaseyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Southern California University for Professional Studies · USUniversity of Southern California · USInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Studies of Genetic Variation in Colorectal CancerU19CA148107 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GRUBER, STEPHEN B · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
Inherited colorectal cancer risk variants: from association to biologyR01CA143237 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CASEY, GRAHAM · 2010 to 2020
$8.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143237NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) have led to the identification of a number of common variants associated with modest risk. Several risk variants map within the vicinity of TGFβ/BMP signaling pathway genes, including rs4939827 within an intron of SMAD7 at 18q21.1. A previous study implicated a novel SNP (novel 1 or rs58920878) as a functional variant within an enhancer element in SMAD7 intron 4. In this study, we show that four SNPs including novel 1 (rs6507874, rs6507875, rs8085824, and rs58920878) in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the index SNP rs4939827 demonstrate allele-specific enhancer effects in a large, multi-component enhancer of SMAD7. All four SNPs demonstrate allele-specific protein binding to nuclear extracts of CRC cell lines. Furthermore, some of the risk-associated alleles correlate with increased expression of SMAD7 in normal colon tissues. Finally, we show that the enhancer is responsive to BMP4 stimulation. Taken together, we propose that the associated CRC risk at 18q21.1 is due to four functional variants that regulate SMAD7 expression and potentially perturb a BMP negative feedback loop in TGFβ/BMP signaling pathways.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideBone Morphogenetic ProteinsCell Line, TumorChromosomes, Human, Pair 18Colorectal NeoplasmsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGenetic VariationHCT116 CellsHEK293 CellsHumansLinkage DisequilibriumSignal TransductionSmad7 ProteinTransforming Growth Factor betaBone Morphogenetic ProteinsSmad7 ProteinSMAD7 protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID25375357
PMCPMC4223076
OpenAlexW2045459421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.