Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25375162›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Mexico (2000-2011): a systematic literature search and analysis.

Héctor Gómez Dantés, José Arturo Farfán-Ale, Elsa Sarti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Symptoms of Arboviruses in Mexico.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Measuring Consumer Willingness to Pay to Reduce Health Risks of Contracting Dengue Fever.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Human Babesiosis, Yucatán State, Mexico, 2015.Emerging infectious diseases · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Héctor Gómez DantésInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
José Arturo Farfán-AleHideyo Noguchi Institute, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Elsa SartiSanofi Pasteur, Coyoacan, Mexico D.F., Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic literature review describes the epidemiology of dengue disease in Mexico (2000-2011). The annual number of uncomplicated dengue cases reported increased from 1,714 in 2000 to 15,424 in 2011 (incidence rates of 1.72 and 14.12 per 100,000 population, respectively). Peaks were observed in 2002, 2007, and 2009. Coastal states were most affected by dengue disease. The age distribution pattern showed an increasing number of cases during childhood, a peak at 10-20 years, and a gradual decline during adulthood. All four dengue virus serotypes were detected. Although national surveillance is in place, there are knowledge gaps relating to asymptomatic cases, primary/secondary infections, and seroprevalence rates of infection in all age strata. Under-reporting of the clinical spectrum of the disease is also problematic. Dengue disease remains a serious public health problem in Mexico.

Indexed as

Age DistributionDengueDengue VirusHumansIncidenceMexicoSeasonsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSerogroupSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID25375162
PMCPMC4222737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.