Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25375102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A developmental model for branching morphogenesis of lake cress compound leaf.

Akiko Nakamasu, Hokuto Nakayama, Naomi Nakayama, Nobuhiko J Suematsu, Seisuke Kimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akiko NakamasuDepartment of Bioresource and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan; Meiji Institute for Advanced Study of Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hokuto NakayamaDepartment of Bioresource and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan.
Naomi NakayamaInstitute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian, United Kingdom.
Nobuhiko J SuematsuMeiji Institute for Advanced Study of Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan; Graduate School of Advanced Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan.
Seisuke KimuraDepartment of Bioresource and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lake cress, Rorippa aquatica (Brassicaceae), is a semi-aquatic plant that exhibits a variety of leaf shapes, from simple leaves to highly branched compound leaves, depending on the environment. Leaf shape can vary within a single plant, suggesting that the variation can be explained by a simple model. In order to simulate the branched structure in the compound leaves of R. aquatica, we implemented reaction-diffusion (RD) patterning onto a theoretical framework that had been developed for serration distribution in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana, with the modification of the one-dimensional reaction-diffusion domain being deformed with the spatial periodicity of the RD pattern while expanding. This simple method using an iterative pattern could create regular and nested branching patterns. Subsequently, we verified the plausibility of our theoretical model by comparing it with the experimentally observed branching patterns. The results suggested that our model successfully predicted both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the timing and positioning of branching in growing R. aquatica leaves.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalNasturtiumPlant DevelopmentPlant Leaves

Identifiers

PMID25375102
PMCPMC4222892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.