Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25374819›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2014

Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology.

Pasquale Esposito, Antonio Dal Canton

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of nephrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05466656 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Second Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeresa Moreno CasbasRan2021 to 2024Enrolled115ConditionsPain, Incontinence, Urinary, Obesity, Childhood, BreastfeedingArmsContinuous quality improvement cycle model
NCT06522529 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Thrid Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIRan2024 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsPain, Obesity, Childhood, Breast Feeding, Incontinence, UrinaryArmsMultifaceted implementation strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Letter to editor regarding the lightning process.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DEKODE-A cloud-based performance feedback model improved DKA care across multiple hospitals in the UK.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pasquale EspositoPasquale Esposito, Antonio Dal Canton, Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Antonio Dal CantonPasquale Esposito, Antonio Dal Canton, Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation and improvement of quality of care provided to the patients are of crucial importance in the daily clinical practice and in the health policy planning and financing. Different tools have been developed, including incident analysis, health technology assessment and clinical audit. The clinical audit consist of measuring a clinical outcome or a process, against well-defined standards set on the principles of evidence-based medicine in order to identify the changes needed to improve the quality of care. In particular, patients suffering from chronic renal diseases, present many problems that have been set as topics for clinical audit projects, such as hypertension, anaemia and mineral metabolism management. Although the results of these studies have been encouraging, demonstrating the effectiveness of audit, overall the present evidence is not clearly in favour of clinical audit. These findings call attention to the need to further studies to validate this methodology in different operating scenarios. This review examines the principle of clinical audit, focusing on experiences performed in nephrology settings.

Indexed as

Clinical auditEvidence-based medicineHemodialysisNephrologyQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID25374819
PMCPMC4220358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.