Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25374760›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2014

Evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding: Update of current radiologic strategies.

Parth J Parekh, Ross C Buerlein, Rouzbeh Shams, Harlan Vingan, David A Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Dieulafoy lesions and gastrointestinal bleeding.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parth J ParekhParth J Parekh, Rouzbeh Shams, Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23510, United States.
Ross C BuerleinParth J Parekh, Rouzbeh Shams, Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23510, United States.
Rouzbeh ShamsParth J Parekh, Rouzbeh Shams, Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23510, United States.
Harlan VinganParth J Parekh, Rouzbeh Shams, Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23510, United States.
David A JohnsonParth J Parekh, Rouzbeh Shams, Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23510, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common presentation with significant associated morbidity and mortality, the prevalence of which continues to rise with the ever-increasing aging population. Initial evaluation includes an esophagoduodeonscopy and/or colonoscopy, which may fail to reveal a source. Such cases prove to be a dilemma and require collaboration between gastroenterology and radiology in deciding the most appropriate approach. Recently, there have been a number of radiologic advances in the approach to GIB. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based update on the most current radiologic modalities available and an algorithmic approach to GIB.

Indexed as

AngiographyEmbolizationEnterographyEnteroscopyGastrointestinal bleedingScintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID25374760
PMCPMC4218949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.