Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25374667›Full record

ReviewF1000prime reports2014

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of sarcoidosis.

Marc A Judson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000prime reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of 18F-FDG PET in assessing response to treatment in adults with pulmonary sarcoidosis: A systematic literature review.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cystic bronchiectasis in sarcoidosis.Clinical case reports · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pathogenetic mechanism of oral granulomatous diseases: An update.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Utility ofBioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Trouble Spotted in the Liver!Digestive diseases and sciences · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marc A JudsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine MC-91, Albany Medical College Albany, New York 12208 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript outlines recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of sarcoidosis. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis can occasionally be made on clinical grounds without a confirmatory biopsy when very specific clinical findings are present. Otherwise, the diagnosis requires histologic evidence of granulomatous inflammation, exclusion of alternative causes, and evidence of systemic disease. Because there is no available diagnostic test for sarcoidosis, the diagnosis is never completely secure. Instruments have been developed to establish the presence of sarcoidosis in a second organ and hence establish the systemic nature of the disease. Corticosteroids remain the drug of choice for the treatment of sarcoidosis. Additional sarcoidosis medications are most commonly used as corticosteroid-sparing agents. Recent clinical sarcoidosis drug trials have exposed important issues that may confound trial results, including selecting patients with active disease, identifying study drug effects in patients receiving concomitant corticosteroids, and establishing proper study endpoints.

Identifiers

PMID25374667
PMCPMC4191271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.