ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014
Stochastic models of cellular circadian rhythms in plants help to understand the impact of noise on robustness and clock structure.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Red Light Resets the Expression Pattern, Phase, and Period of the Circadian Clock in Plants: A Computational Approach.Biology · 2022Article
- A spatial model of the plant circadian clock reveals design principles for coordinated timing.Molecular systems biology · 2022Article
- Restoring circadian gene profiles in clock networks using synthetic feedback control.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Article
- A Holistic Approach to Study Photosynthetic Acclimation Responses of Plants to Fluctuating Light.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Signaling pathways have an inherent need for noise to acquire information.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Circadian Rhythms and Redox State in Plants: Till Stress Do Us Part.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Heterogeneity of cellular circadian clocks in intact plants and its correction under light-dark cycles.Science advances · 2016Article
- A Compact Model for the Complex Plant Circadian Clock.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Label-free quantitative analysis of the casein kinase 2-responsive phosphoproteome of the marine minimal model species Ostreococcus tauri.Proteomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhythmic behavior is essential for plants; for example, daily (circadian) rhythms control photosynthesis and seasonal rhythms regulate their life cycle. The core of the circadian clock is a genetic network that coordinates the expression of specific clock genes in a circadian rhythm reflecting the 24-h day/night cycle. Circadian clocks exhibit stochastic noise due to the low copy numbers of clock genes and the consequent cell-to-cell variation: this intrinsic noise plays a major role in circadian clocks by inducing more robust oscillatory behavior. Another source of noise is the environment, which causes variation in temperature and light intensity: this extrinsic noise is part of the requirement for the structural complexity of clock networks. Advances in experimental techniques now permit single-cell measurements and the development of single-cell models. Here we present some modeling studies showing the importance of considering both types of noise in understanding how plants adapt to regular and irregular light variations. Stochastic models have proven useful for understanding the effect of regular variations. By contrast, the impact of irregular variations and the interaction of different noise sources are less well studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.