Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25374528›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Neurofeedback in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - different models, different ways of application.

Holger Gevensleben, Gunther H Moll, Aribert Rothenberger, Hartmut Heinrich

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02572180 (A Biofeedback Training in Schoolchildren With an Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02572180 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Biofeedback Training in Schoolchildren With an Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Differential Effects of Training in a 2D or 3D Environment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2015Enrolled90ConditionsAttention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder of Childhood or Adolescence NosArmsEMG-based biofeedback training, NIRS-based neurofeedback training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. tDCS and neurofeedback in ADHD treatment.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Mechanisms of brain self-regulation: psychological factors, mechanistic models and neural substrates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Holger GevenslebenChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
Gunther H MollDepartment of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, University Hospital of Erlangen Erlangen, Germany.
Aribert RothenbergerChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
Hartmut HeinrichDepartment of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, University Hospital of Erlangen Erlangen, Germany ; Heckscher-Klinikum München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), different neurofeedback (NF) protocols have been applied, with the most prominent differentiation between EEG frequency-band (e.g., theta/beta) training and training of slow cortical potentials (SCPs). However, beyond distinctions between such basic NF variables, there are also competing assumptions about mechanisms of action (e.g., acquisition of regulation capability, generalization to daily life behavior). In the present article, we provide a framework for NF models and suppose two hypothetical models, which we call "conditioning-and-repairing model" and "skill-acquisition model," reflecting extreme poles within this framework. We argue that the underlying model has an impact not only on how NF is applied but also on the selection of evaluation strategies and suggest using evaluation strategies beyond beaten paths of pharmacological research. Reflecting available studies, we address to what extent different views are supported by empirical data. We hypothesize that different models may hold true depending on the processes and behaviors to be addressed by a certain NF protocol. For example, the skill-acquisition model is supported by recent findings as an adequate explanatory framework for the mechanisms of action of SCP training in ADHD. In conclusion, evaluation and interpretation of NF trials in ADHD should be based on the underlying model and the way training is applied, which, in turn, should be stated explicitly in study reports.

Indexed as

applicationattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)evaluationlearningmodelneurofeedback

Identifiers

PMID25374528
PMCPMC4204462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.