Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25374369›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014

Antibiotics for meconium-stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections.

Thitiporn Siriwachirachai, Ussanee S Sangkomkamhang, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antibiotics for neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Retrospective analysis of risk factors for low 1-minute Apgar scores in term neonates.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Meconium Amniotic Fluid is Associated with Endomyometritis.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thitiporn SiriwachirachaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Khon Kaen Hospital, Srichan Road, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40000.
Ussanee S Sangkomkamhang
Pisake Lumbiganon
Malinee Laopaiboon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChorioamnionitis is more likely to occur when meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is present. Meconium may enhance the growth of bacteria in amniotic fluid by serving as a growth factor, inhibiting bacteriostatic properties of amniotic fluid. Many adverse neonatal outcomes related to MSAF result from meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). MSAF is associated with both maternal and newborn infections. Antibiotics may be an effective option to reduce such morbidity.

objectivesThe objective of this review is to assess the efficacy and side effects of prophylactic antibiotics for MSAF during labour in preventing maternal and neonatal infections. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic antibiotics with placebo or no treatment during labour for women with MSAF. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. MAIN

resultsWe included two studies with 362 pregnant women. Both studies compared ampicillin-sulbactam (N = 183) versus normal saline (N = 179) in pregnant women with MSAF. Prophylactic antibiotics appeared to have no statistically significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.76), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.78) and postpartum endometritis (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.38). However, there was a significant decrease in the risk of chorioamnionitis (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62). No serious adverse effects were reported. Drug resistance, duration of mechanical ventilation and duration of admission to NICU/hospital were not reported. Most of the domains for risk of bias were at low risk of bias for one study and at unclear risk of bias for the other study. The quality of the evidence using GRADE was low for neonatal sepsis, postpartum endometritis, and neonatal mortality and morbidity prior to discharge (Neonatal intensive care admissions) and of moderate quality for chorioamnionitis. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent evidence indicates that compared to placebo, antibiotics for MSAF in labour may reduce chorioamnionitis. There was no evidence that antibiotics could reduce postpartum endometritis, neonatal sepsis and NICU admission. This systematic review identifies the need for more well-designed, adequately powered RCTs to assess the effect of prophylactic antibiotics in the incidence of maternal and neonatal complications.

Indexed as

Amniotic FluidLabor, ObstetricMeconiumAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsChorioamnionitisEndometritisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisSulbactamAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsSulbactamsultamicillin

Identifiers

PMID25374369
PMCPMC6823264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.