Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25374313›Full record

SynthesisCurrent diabetes reports2014

Community health worker interventions for Latinos with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Tariana V Little, Monica L Wang, Eida M Castro, Julio Jiménez, Milagros C Rosal

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current diabetes reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Peer Support for the Hardly Reached: A Systematic Review.American journal of public health · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Linacre quarterly · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tariana V LittleClinical and Population Health Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA, tariana.little@umassmed.edu.
Monica L Wang
Eida M Castro
Julio Jiménez
Milagros C Rosal

Funding

UMass Center for Health Equity Intervention ResearchP60MD006912 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI HARGRAVES, J LEE · 2012 to 2016
$6.8M
UMMS PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER FOR OBESITY AND RELATED CONDITIONS-CATEGORY 2U48DP001933 · DP · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEMON, STEPHENIE C. · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
A culturally-tailored narrative intervention to target disparities in obesityK01DK102447 · NIDDK · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WANG, MONICA L. · 2014 to 2018
$631k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001933NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK102447NIMHD NIH HHS 1 P60 MD006912NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD006912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to synthesize glucose (HbA1c) outcomes of community health worker (CHW)-delivered interventions for Latinos with type 2 diabetes that were tested in randomized controlled trials and to summarize characteristics of the targeted populations and interventions, including the background, training, and supervision of the CHWs. Searches of PubMed and Google Scholar databases and references from selected articles identified 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, seven reported statistically significant improvements in HbA1c. Study participants were largely low-income, female, and Spanish-speaking and had uncontrolled diabetes. The CHWs led the interventions alone, in pairs, or as part of a team. Interventions varied considerably in session time, duration, and number. Most met standards for tailored, high-intensity interventions and half were theory-based. Overall, methodological quality was good but there were inconsistencies in the reporting of key information. Future research should report in greater detail CHW background, training, and supervision; examine factors associated with intervention effectiveness; and provide data on cost and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersHispanic or LatinoRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID25374313
PMCPMC6191032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.