Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25374047›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2014

The effects of HIV testing advocacy messages on test acceptance: a randomized clinical trial.

Monica L Kasting, Anthony D Cox, Dena Cox, Kenneth H Fife, Barry P Katz, Gregory D Zimet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00771537 (HIV Testing & Womens Attitudes on HIV Vaccine Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00771537 phase3completednot on this map

HIV Testing & Womens Attitudes on HIV Vaccine Trials

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2006 to 2011Enrolled2,031ConditionsHIVArmsMessage Sidedness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monica L Kasting
Anthony D Cox
Dena Cox
Kenneth H Fife
Barry P Katz
Gregory D Zimet
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USRichard M. Fairbanks Foundation · US

Funding

HIV Testing and Women's Attitudes on HIV Vaccine TrialsR01NR010004 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI ZIMET, GREGORY D. · 2006 to 2010
$2.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly 1 in 5 people living with HIV in the United States are unaware they are infected. Therefore, it is important to develop and evaluate health communication messages that clinicians can use to encourage HIV testing.

methodsThe objective was to evaluate health communication messages designed to increase HIV testing rates among women and evaluate possible moderators of message effect. We used a randomized four-arm clinical trial conducted at urban community outpatient health clinics involving 1,919 female patients, 18 to 64 years old. The four health message intervention groups were: i) information-only control; ii) one-sided message describing the advantages of HIV testing; iii) two-sided message acknowledging a superficial objection to testing (i.e., a 20 minute wait for results) followed by a description of the advantages of testing; and iv) two-sided message acknowledging a serious objection (i.e., fear of testing positive for HIV) followed by a description of the advantages of testing. The main outcome was acceptance of an oral rapid HIV test.

resultsParticipants were randomized to receive the control message (n = 483), one-sided message (n = 480), two-sided message with a superficial objection (n = 481), or two-sided message with a serious objection (n = 475). The overall rate of HIV test acceptance was 83%. The two-sided message groups were not significantly different from the controls. The one-sided message group, however, had a lower rate of testing (80%) than the controls (86%) (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.93; P = 0.018). "Perceived obstacles to HIV testing" moderated this effect, indicating that the decrease in HIV test acceptance for the one-sided message group was only statistically significant for those who had reported high levels of obstacles to HIV testing (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.67; P = 0.001).

conclusionsNone of the messages increased test acceptance. The one-sided message decreased acceptance and this effect was particularly true for women with greater perceived obstacles to testing, the very group one would most want to persuade. This finding suggests that efforts to persuade those who are reluctant to get tested, in some circumstances, may have unanticipated negative effects. Other approaches to messaging around HIV testing should be investigated, particularly with diverse, behaviorally high-risk populations.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00771537. Registration date: October 10. 2008.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicSerologic TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25374047
PMCPMC4243315
OpenAlexW1972978309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.