Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25373920›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2014

Topical analgesics for neuropathic pain in the elderly: current and future prospects.

Jana Sawynok

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03096444 (Antipruritic Effect of Topical Ketamine, Amitriptyline, and Lidocaine), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03096444 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Antipruritic Effect of Topical Ketamine, Amitriptyline, and Lidocaine

TypeinterventionalSponsorGil YosipovitchRan2017 to 2017Enrolled13ConditionsPruritusArmsKetamine Hydrochloride, Amitriptyline Hydrochloride, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Ketamine hydrochloride, Amitriptyline hydrochloride, and Lidocaine hydrochloride, Lipoderm Cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Pain in old age].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jana SawynokDepartment of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, jana.sawynok@dal.ca.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a significant medical and socioeconomic burden with limited therapeutic options. Elderly patients exhibit a higher incidence of several NeP conditions and pose a particular challenge due to age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues, comorbid conditions, and polypharmacy, as well as frailty and cognitive decline. Topical analgesics are of interest because of their comparable efficacy to oral agents, good tolerability and safety, and potential to be add-on therapies to oral treatments. In recent years, two topical formulations for NeP have been approved (5% lidocaine medicated plaster, 8% capsaicin patch) but are not available in all countries. There are controlled trials and a growing body of open-label reports on their use in clinical care. Some studies provide a post hoc analysis of data in relation to older age (≥65 years), which is useful. The body of evidence relating to topical investigational agents is growing and involves controlled trials as well as individual cases. The largest single body of information is for topical ketamine, administered either alone or combined with other agents (particularly amitriptyline), and some large randomized controlled trials report efficacy. Other large trials involve topical clonidine and further ketamine combinations. Compounding analgesics involves challenges, including uncertain composition (two to five ingredients are used) and concentrations (range 0.5-5%), as well as the heterogeneity of data that support choices. Nevertheless, case reports and acceptable response rates in larger cohorts are intriguing, and this area merits further investigation in controlled settings as well as continued documentation of clinical experiences.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAgedAnalgesicsChemistry, PharmaceuticalHealth Services for the AgedHumansNeuralgiaPain MeasurementAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID25373920
OpenAlexW2016037534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.