Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25373869›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Effects of anticholinergic challenge on psychopathology and cognition in drug-free patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.

Tanja Veselinović, Ingo Vernaleken, Hildegard Janouschek, Thilo Kellermann, Michael Paulzen, Paul Cumming, Gerhard Gründer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of striatal dopamine DPsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  12. Relationship between muscarinic MNeuroImage. Clinical · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Potentiation of M1 Muscarinic Receptor Reverses Plasticity Deficits and Negative and Cognitive Symptoms in a Schizophrenia Mouse Model.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanja VeselinovićDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany, tveselinovic@ukaachen.de.
Ingo Vernaleken
Hildegard Janouschek
Thilo Kellermann
Michael Paulzen
Paul Cumming
Gerhard Gründer
RWTH Aachen University · DEJülich Aachen Research Alliance · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMany aspects of the neurobiology of schizophrenia, especially the physiological basis of the negative symptoms and associated cognitive deficits, remain inadequately understood. Tandon and Greden (1989) postulated a central role of dopaminergic/cholinergic imbalance in schizophrenia. OBJECTIVE/

methodsIn light of this hypothesis, we elected to investigate the effects of anticholinergic challenge on psychopathology, cognition and attention in 12 unmedicated patients with schizophrenia and 12 healthy controls. The first examination occurred before any pharmacological intervention; the second examination was carried out immediately following an intravenous infusion of 5 mg biperiden, a centrally acting antimuscarinergic agent.

resultsThe biperiden challenge provoked a considerable increase in PANSS scores in both groups which was significantly more pronounced in patients (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (rmANOVA): F(df) = 6.4(1,22); p = 0.019). The increase in the PANSS scores showed a significant negative correlation with age in patients. Biperiden caused considerable cognitive impairments in both groups. A significant group difference (rmANOVA) could be observed for TMT-B (F(df) = 11.29(1,22); p = 0.003).

conclusionsThe anticholinergic intervention caused more pronounced psychopathological and cognitive deteriorating effects in patients suffering from schizophrenia than in healthy volunteers. This could be related to the disrupted cholinergic transmission in schizophrenia. Our findings speak on behalf of the need of a more restrictive use of anticholinergics in psychiatric patients. The age-related attenuation of PANSS score increases in patients could be related to the age-dependent changes in dopamine dynamics and also to the age-associated decline of the availability of muscarinic receptors. Our results emphasise the need for further investigation of cholinergic disturbances in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAdolescentAdultAttentionBiperidenCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsNeuropsychological TestsYoung AdultBiperidenMuscarinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID25373869
OpenAlexW1973751024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.