Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25373835›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015

Hospice use among nursing home and non-nursing home patients.

Kathleen T Unroe, Greg A Sachs, M E Dennis, Susan E Hickman, Timothy E Stump, Wanzhu Tu, Christopher M Callahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Variation in Hospice Aide Care by Residential Setting.Journal of palliative medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathleen T UnroeIndiana University Center for Aging Research, 410 West 10th Street, Suite 2000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA, kunroe@iu.edu.
Greg A Sachs
M E Dennis
Susan E Hickman
Timothy E Stump
Wanzhu Tu
Christopher M Callahan

Funding

Patient-Oriented Research to Improve Geriatric Care-K24K24AG024078 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2004 to 2013
$1.4M
MODELING ALZHEIMER DISEASE COSTS AND TRANSITIONSR01AG031222 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG024078NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor nursing home patients, hospice use and associated costs have grown dramatically. A better understanding of hospice in all care settings, especially how patients move across settings, is needed to inform debates about appropriateness of use and potential policy reform.

objectiveOur aim was to describe characteristics and utilization of hospice among nursing home and non-nursing home patients. DESIGN AND

participantsMedicare, Medicaid and Minimum Data Set data, 1999-2008, were merged for 3,771 hospice patients aged 65 years and above from a safety net health system. Patients were classified into four groups who received hospice: 1) only in nursing homes; 2) outside of nursing homes; 3) crossover patients utilizing hospice in both settings; and 4) "near-transition" patients who received hospice within 30 days of a nursing home stay. MAIN MEASURES: Differences in demographics, hospice diagnoses and length of stay, utilization and costs are presented with descriptive statistics. KEY

resultsNursing home hospice patients were older, and more likely to be women and to have dementia (p < 0.0001). Nearly one-third (32.3 %) of crossover patients had hospice stays > 6 months, compared with the other groups (16 % of nursing home hospice only, 10.7 % of non-nursing home hospice and 7.6 % of those with near transitions) (p < 0.0001). Overall, 27.7 % of patients had a hospice stay <1 week, but there were marked differences between groups-48 % of near-transition patients vs. 7.4 % of crossover patients had these short hospice stays (p < 0.0001). Crossover and near-transition hospice patients had higher costs to Medicare compared to other groups (p < 0.05).

conclusionsDichotomizing hospice users only into nursing home vs. non-nursing home patients is difficult, due to transitions across settings. Hospice patients with transitions accrue higher costs. The impact of changes to the hospice benefit on patients who live or move through nursing homes near the end of life should be carefully considered.

Indexed as

MedicaidMedicareNursing HomesAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCross-Over StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Services Needs and DemandHospice CareHospicesHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25373835
PMCPMC4314502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.