Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25373706›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

Current recommendations for surveillance and surgery of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms may overlook some patients with cancer.

Andrew H Nguyen, Paul A Toste, James J Farrell, Barbara M Clerkin, Jennifer Williams, V Raman Muthusamy, Rabindra R Watson, James S Tomlinson, O Joe Hines, Howard A Reber and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cysts.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Static and DynamicJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Pancreatic Cysts in the Elderly.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew H NguyenDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS 72-215, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Paul A Toste
James J Farrell
Barbara M Clerkin
Jennifer Williams
V Raman Muthusamy
Rabindra R Watson
James S Tomlinson
O Joe Hines
Howard A Reber
Timothy R Donahue
University of California, Los Angeles · USHarbor–UCLA Medical Center · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK041301 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROZENGURT, JUAN ENRIQUE · 1990 to 2019
$18.0M
GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007180 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JENSEN, DENNIS MICHAEL · 1986 to 2025
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK041301NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007180NIDDK NIH HHS T32DK07180-39
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2012 Sendai Criteria recommend that patients with 3 cm or larger branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) without any additional "worrisome features" or "high-risk stigmata" may undergo close observation. Furthermore, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is not recommended for BD-IPMN <2 cm. These changes have generated concern among physicians treating patients with pancreatic diseases. The purposes of this study were to (i) apply the new Sendai guidelines to our institution's surgically resected BD-IPMN and (ii) reevaluate cyst size cutoffs in identifying patients with lesions harboring high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 150 patients at a university medical center with preoperatively diagnosed and pathologically confirmed IPMNs. Sixty-six patients had BD-IPMN. Pathologic grade was dichotomized into low-grade (low or intermediate grade dysplasia) or high-grade/invasive (high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancers). Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, student's t test, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.

resultsThe median BD-IPMN size on imaging was 2.4 cm (interquartile range 1.5-3.0). Fifty-one (77 %) low-grade and 15 (23 %) high-grade/invasive BD-IPMN were identified. ROC analysis demonstrated that cyst size on preoperative imaging is a reasonable predictor of grade with an area under the curve of 0.691. Two-thirds of high-grade/invasive BD-IPMN were <3 cm (n = 10). Compared to a cutoff of 3, 2 cm was associated with higher sensitivity (73.3 vs. 33.3 %) and negative predictive value (83.3 vs. 80 %, NPV) for high-grade/invasive BD-IPMN. Mural nodules on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or atypical cells on endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) were identified in all cysts <2 and only 50 % of those <3 cm. Forty percent of cysts >3 cm were removed based on size alone. DISCUSSION/

conclusionsOur results suggest that "larger" size on noninvasive imaging can indicate high-grade/invasive cysts, and EUS-FNA may help identify "smaller" cysts with high-grade/invasive pathology.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCystsEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousPancreatectomyPancreatic DuctsPancreatic NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25373706
PMCPMC4305480
OpenAlexW2051217505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.