Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25373153›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2014

Wolbachia infection and Lepidoptera of conservation concern.

C A Hamm, C A Handley, A Pike, M L Forister, J A Fordyce, C C Nice

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

C A HammDepartment of Entomology and Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48823 Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 cahamm@ucdavis.edu.
C A HandleyDepartment of Biology, Population and Conservation Biology Program, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 ch1564@txstate.edu.
A PikeDepartment of Entomology and Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48823 Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 apike@jhsph.edu.
M L ForisterDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557 mforister@unr.edu.
J A FordyceDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 jfordyce@utk.edu.
C C NiceDepartment of Biology, Population and Conservation Biology Program, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 ccnice@txstate.edu.
Texas State University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation of at-risk species requires multi-faceted and carefully-considered management approaches to be successful. For arthropods, the presence of endosymbiotic bacteria, such as Wolbachia (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae), may complicate management plans and exacerbate the challenges faced by conservation managers. Wolbachia poses a substantial and underappreciated threat to the conservation of arthropods because infection may induce a number of phenotypic effects, most of which are considered deleterious to the host population. In this study, the prevalence of Wolbachia infection in lepidopteran species of conservation concern was examined. Using standard molecular techniques, 22 species of Lepidoptera were screened, of which 19 were infected with Wolbachia. This rate is comparable to that observed in insects as a whole. However, this is likely an underestimate because geographic sampling was not extensive and may not have included infected segments of the species' ranges. Wolbachia infections may be particularly problematic for conservation management plans that incorporate captive propagation or translocation. Inadvertent introduction of Wolbachia into uninfected populations or introduction of a new strain may put these populations at greater risk for extinction. Further sampling to investigate the geographic extent of Wolbachia infections within species of conservation concern and experiments designed to determine the nature of the infection phenotype(s) are necessary to manage the potential threat of infection.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsDNA, BacterialFemaleLepidopteraMalePolymerase Chain ReactionUnited StatesWolbachiaDNA, Bacterialcaptive rearingendangered speciesendosymbionttranslocation

Identifiers

PMID25373153
PMCPMC4199377
OpenAlexW2147857900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.