Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25373146›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

Genome accessibility is widely preserved and locally modulated during mitosis.

Chris C-S Hsiung, Christapher S Morrissey, Maheshi Udugama, Christopher L Frank, Cheryl A Keller, Songjoon Baek, Belinda Giardine, Gregory E Crawford, Myong-Hee Sung, Ross C Hardison and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chris C-S HsiungDivision of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA;
Christapher S MorrisseyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
Maheshi UdugamaDivision of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA;
Christopher L FrankInstitute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
Cheryl A KellerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
Songjoon BaekLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA;
Belinda GiardineDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
Gregory E CrawfordCenter for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Myong-Hee SungLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA;
Ross C HardisonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
Gerd A BlobelDivision of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA; blobel@email.chop.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USDuke University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Chromatin Structure and Gene ExpressionZIABC005450 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HAGER, GORDON L · 2009 to 2025
$35.2M
Transcriptional Networks Controlling Erythroid DifferentiationR01DK054937 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Gerd A Blobel · 1999 to 2026
$12.8M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM008216 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EPSTEIN, DOUGLAS J · 1987 to 2023
$8.3M
Global Predictions and Tests of Erythroid RegulationR01DK065806 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, CHIAROMONTE, FRANCESCA · 2004 to 2013
$5.3M
Enhance human ENCODE by function comparisons to mouseRC2HG005573 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HARDISON, ROSS C · 2009 to 2011
$2.2M
Global Predictions and Tests of Hematopoietic RegulationR56DK065806 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, BODINE, DAVID M. · 2014 to 2014
$224k
Intramural NIH HHSNHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005573NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054937NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065806NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008216NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitosis entails global alterations to chromosome structure and nuclear architecture, concomitant with transient silencing of transcription. How cells transmit transcriptional states through mitosis remains incompletely understood. While many nuclear factors dissociate from mitotic chromosomes, the observation that certain nuclear factors and chromatin features remain associated with individual loci during mitosis originated the hypothesis that such mitotically retained molecular signatures could provide transcriptional memory through mitosis. To understand the role of chromatin structure in mitotic memory, we performed the first genome-wide comparison of DNase I sensitivity of chromatin in mitosis and interphase, using a murine erythroblast model. Despite chromosome condensation during mitosis visible by microscopy, the landscape of chromatin accessibility at the macromolecular level is largely unaltered. However, mitotic chromatin accessibility is locally dynamic, with individual loci maintaining none, some, or all of their interphase accessibility. Mitotic reduction in accessibility occurs primarily within narrow, highly DNase hypersensitive sites that frequently coincide with transcription factor binding sites, whereas broader domains of moderate accessibility tend to be more stable. In mitosis, proximal promoters generally maintain their accessibility more strongly, whereas distal regulatory elements tend to lose accessibility. Large domains of DNA hypomethylation mark a subset of promoters that retain accessibility during mitosis and across many cell types in interphase. Erythroid transcription factor GATA1 exerts site-specific changes in interphase accessibility that are most pronounced at distal regulatory elements, but has little influence on mitotic accessibility. We conclude that features of open chromatin are remarkably stable through mitosis, but are modulated at the level of individual genes and regulatory elements.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyChromosomesGenomeAnimalsBinding SitesCell CycleCell DifferentiationChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyDeoxyribonuclease IDNA MethylationErythroid CellsGATA1 Transcription FactorHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInterphaseMiceDeoxyribonuclease IGATA1 Transcription FactorTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25373146
PMCPMC4315295
OpenAlexW2126131856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.