Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25372872›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Sexual dimorphism in the human olfactory bulb: females have more neurons and glial cells than males.

Ana V Oliveira-Pinto, Raquel M Santos, Renan A Coutinho, Lays M Oliveira, Gláucia B Santos, Ana T L Alho, Renata E P Leite, José M Farfel, Claudia K Suemoto, Lea T Grinberg and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Olfactory Dysfunction and Cognitive Decline: Are They Related?Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Factors Associated With Persisting Olfactory Dysfunction After COVID-19.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sex and gender differences in cognitive resilience to aging and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Study on the Effect ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana V Oliveira-PintoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Raquel M SantosInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Renan A CoutinhoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lays M OliveiraInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gláucia B SantosAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Brain Institute, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana T L AlhoAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Brain Institute, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata E P LeiteAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
José M FarfelAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Discipline of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia K SuemotoAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Discipline of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lea T GrinbergAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Neurology and Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States of America.
Carlos A PasqualucciAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wilson Jacob-FilhoAging Brain Study Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Discipline of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto LentInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; National Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Ministry of Science and Technology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in the human olfactory function reportedly exist for olfactory sensitivity, odorant identification and memory, and tasks in which odors are rated based on psychological features such as familiarity, intensity, pleasantness, and others. Which might be the neural bases for these behavioral differences? The number of cells in olfactory regions, and especially the number of neurons, may represent a more accurate indicator of the neural machinery than volume or weight, but besides gross volume measures of the human olfactory bulb, no systematic study of sex differences in the absolute number of cells has yet been undertaken. In this work, we investigate a possible sexual dimorphism in the olfactory bulb, by quantifying postmortem material from 7 men and 11 women (ages 55-94 years) with the isotropic fractionator, an unbiased and accurate method to estimate absolute cell numbers in brain regions. Female bulbs weighed 0.132 g in average, while male bulbs weighed 0.137 g, a non-significant difference; however, the total number of cells was 16.2 million in females, and 9.2 million in males, a significant difference of 43.2%. The number of neurons in females reached 6.9 million, being no more than 3.5 million in males, a difference of 49.3%. The number of non-neuronal cells also proved higher in women than in men: 9.3 million and 5.7 million, respectively, a significant difference of 38.7%. The same differences remained when corrected for mass. Results demonstrate a sex-related difference in the absolute number of total, neuronal and non-neuronal cells, favoring women by 40-50%. It is conceivable that these differences in quantitative cellularity may have functional impact, albeit difficult to infer how exactly this would be, without knowing the specific circuits cells make. However, the reported advantage of women as compared to men may stimulate future work on sex dimorphism of synaptic microcircuitry in the olfactory bulb.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurogliaNeuronsOlfactory BulbOrgan SizeSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID25372872
PMCPMC4221136
OpenAlexW2027084443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.