Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25372853›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The same microbiota and a potentially discriminant metabolome in the saliva of omnivore, ovo-lacto-vegetarian and Vegan individuals.

Francesca De Filippis, Lucia Vannini, Antonietta La Storia, Luca Laghi, Paola Piombino, Giuseppina Stellato, Diana I Serrazanetti, Giorgia Gozzi, Silvia Turroni, Ilario Ferrocino and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Francesca De FilippisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Microbiology, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Lucia VanniniDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Inter-Departmental Centre for Industrial Agri-Food Research, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
Antonietta La StoriaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Microbiology, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Luca LaghiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Inter-Departmental Centre for Industrial Agri-Food Research, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
Paola PiombinoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Microbiology, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Giuseppina StellatoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Microbiology, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Diana I SerrazanettiInter-Departmental Centre for Industrial Agri-Food Research, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
Giorgia GozziDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia TurroniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ilario FerrocinoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Camilla LazziDepartment of Food Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Raffaella Di CagnoDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Marco GobbettiDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Danilo ErcoliniDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Microbiology, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The salivary microbiota has been linked to both oral and non-oral diseases. Scant knowledge is available on the effect of environmental factors such as long-term dietary choices on the salivary microbiota and metabolome. This study analyzed the microbial diversity and metabolomic profiles of the saliva of 161 healthy individuals who followed an omnivore or ovo-lacto-vegetarian or vegan diet. A large core microbiota was identified, including 12 bacterial genera, found in >98% of the individuals. The subjects could be stratified into three "salivary types" that differed on the basis of the relative abundance of the core genera Prevotella, Streptococcus/Gemella and Fusobacterium/Neisseria. Statistical analysis indicated no effect of dietary habit on the salivary microbiota. Phylogenetic beta-diversity analysis consistently showed no differences between omnivore, ovo-lacto-vegetarian and vegan individuals. Metabolomic profiling of saliva using (1)H-NMR and GC-MS/SPME identified diet-related biomarkers that enabled a significant discrimination between the 3 groups of individuals on the basis of their diet. Formate, urea, uridine and 5-methyl-3-hexanone could discriminate samples from omnivores, whereas 1-propanol, hexanoic acid and proline were characteristic of non-omnivore diets. Although the salivary metabolome can be discriminating for diet, the microbiota has a remarkable inter-individual stability and did not vary with dietary habits. Microbial homeostasis might be perturbed with sub-standard oral hygiene or other environmental factors, but there is no current indication that a choice of an omnivore, ovo-lacto-vegetarian or vegan diet can lead to a specific composition of the oral microbiota with consequences on the oral homeostasis.

Indexed as

VegansAdolescentAdultBacteriaDiet, VeganFemaleHumansMaleMetabolomeMicrobiotaMiddle AgedSaliva

Identifiers

PMID25372853
PMCPMC4221475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.