Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25372770›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

How can we get close to zero? The potential contribution of biomedical prevention and the investment framework towards an effective response to HIV.

John Stover, Timothy B Hallett, Zunyou Wu, Mitchell Warren, Chaitra Gopalappa, Carel Pretorius, Peter D Ghys, Julio Montaner, Bernhard Schwartländer, New Prevention Technology Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

John StoverFutures Institute, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
Timothy B HallettImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Zunyou WuChina Centers for Disease Control, Beijing, China.
Mitchell WarrenAIDS Vaccine Advocacy AVAC, New York, New York, United States of America.
Chaitra GopalappaFutures Institute, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
Carel PretoriusFutures Institute, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
Peter D GhysUnited Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland.
Julio MontanerBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
Bernhard SchwartländerWorld Health Organization (WHO), Beijing, China.
New Prevention Technology Study Group
Avenir Health · USAIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition · USAIDS Vancouver · CABeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNImperial College London · GBJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS · CH

Funding

CIHR 125948-1CIHR 129971-1Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2011 an Investment Framework was proposed that described how the scale-up of key HIV interventions could dramatically reduce new HIV infections and deaths in low and middle income countries by 2015. This framework included ambitious coverage goals for prevention and treatment services resulting in a reduction of new HIV infections by more than half. However, it also estimated a leveling in the number of new infections at about 1 million annually after 2015.

methodsWe modeled how the response to AIDS can be further expanded by scaling up antiretroviral treatment (ART) within the framework provided by the 2013 WHO treatment guidelines. We further explored the potential contributions of new prevention technologies: 'Test and Treat', pre-exposure prophylaxis and an HIV vaccine.

findingsImmediate aggressive scale up of existing approaches including the 2013 WHO guidelines could reduce new infections by 80%. A 'Test and Treat' approach could further reduce new infections. This could be further enhanced by a future highly effective pre-exposure prophylaxis and an HIV vaccine, so that a combination of all four approaches could reduce new infections to as low as 80,000 per year by 2050 and annual AIDS deaths to 260,000.

interpretationIn a set of ambitious scenarios, we find that immediate implementation of the 2013 WHO antiretroviral therapy guidelines could reduce new HIV infections by 80%. Further reductions may be achieved by moving to a 'Test and Treat' approach, and eventually by adding a highly effective pre-exposure prophylaxis and an HIV vaccine, if they become available.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyInvestmentsModels, TheoreticalCost-Benefit AnalysisGlobal HealthHealth ResourcesHIV InfectionsHumansMortalityQuality of LifeSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID25372770
PMCPMC4221192
OpenAlexW1967703625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.