Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25372384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The MluI cell cycle box (MCB) motifs, but not damage-responsive elements (DREs), are responsible for the transcriptional induction of the rhp51+ gene in response to DNA replication stress.

Wugangerile Sartagul, Xin Zhou, Yuki Yamada, Ning Ma, Katsunori Tanaka, Tomoyuki Furuyashiki, Yan Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wugangerile SartagulDivision of Pharmacology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, China; Division of Pharmacology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yuki YamadaDivision of Pharmacology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Ning MaDivision of Pharmacology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Katsunori TanakaDepartment of Bioscience, School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, Sanda, Japan.
Tomoyuki FuruyashikiDivision of Pharmacology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yan MaDivision of Pharmacology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kobe University · JPKwansei Gakuin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication stress induces the transcriptional activation of rhp51+, a fission yeast recA homolog required for repair of DNA double strand breaks. However, the mechanism by which DNA replication stress activates rhp51+ transcription is not understood. The promoter region of rhp51+ contains two damage-responsive elements (DREs) and two MluI cell cycle box (MCB) motifs. Using luciferase reporter assays, we examined the role of these elements in rhp51+ transcription. The full-length rhp51+ promoter and a promoter fragment containing MCB motifs only, but not a fragment containing DREs, mediated transcriptional activation upon DNA replication stress. Removal of the MCB motifs from the rhp51+ promoter abolished the induction of rhp51+ transcription by DNA replication stress. Consistent with a role for MCB motifs in rhp51+ transcription activation, deletion of the MBF (MCB-binding factor) co-repressors Nrm1 and Yox1 precluded rhp51+ transcriptional induction in response to DNA replication stress. Using cells deficient in checkpoint signaling molecules, we found that the Rad3-Cds1/Chk1 pathway partially mediated rhp51+ transcription in response to DNA replication stress, suggesting the involvement of unidentified checkpoint signaling pathways. Because MBF is critical for G1/S transcription, we examined how the cell cycle affected rhp51+ transcription. The transcription of rhp51+ and cdc18+, an MBF-dependent G1/S gene, peaked simultaneously in synchronized cdc25-22 cells. Furthermore, DNA replication stress maintained transcription of rhp51+ similarly to cdc18+. Collectively, these results suggest that MBF and its regulators mediate rhp51+ transcription in response to DNA replication stress, and underlie rhp51+ transcription at the G1/S transition.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA ReplicationNucleotide MotifsResponse ElementsStress, PhysiologicalTranscription, GeneticCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Homeodomain ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRad51 RecombinaseRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsCds1 protein, S pombeCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Homeodomain ProteinsNrm1 protein, S cerevisiaerad3 protein, S pombeRad51 RecombinaseRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsYox1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID25372384
PMCPMC4221157
OpenAlexW2142075783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.